give me great advice. in her exact words, it was, your colleagues will always thank you for your brevity. that s so true. well, let s give this a go then. so the first thing we re going to talk about is the privileges committee. that s the committee of the house of commons, which originally investigated borisjohnson and found that he d misled parliament in his comments about party gate and they recommended the 90 day suspension. now, one of the reasons the suspension, how am i doing? ok so far? good, good. was so long is because he himself had criticised the work of the committee and kind of tried to shed doubt on the work it was doing. but it wasn tjust him. it was also some of his parliamentary allies. people like nadine dorries and jacob rees mogg could also very publicly criticise the committee and challenge the political background of the chair, harriet harman, and things like that, and dragged up all the tweets of her about party gate. so the committee did another inquiry into
such success? i think it s a reflection such success? i think it s a reflection of such success? i think it s a reflection of the such success? i think it s a reflection of the people . reflection of the people wanting a change. they have had nine years of military and quasi military rule and now they have spoken and they want they have spoken and they want the military government to step back and let someone else give it a go. 50 back and let someone else give it a .o ., back and let someone else give it a no. ., ., back and let someone else give ita no. ., ., , back and let someone else give itaao. ., , , it a go. so how do you see this -la in: it a go. so how do you see this playing out? it a go. so how do you see this playing out? will it a go. so how do you see this playing out? will it it a go. so how do you see this playing out? will it be - it a go. so how do you see this playing out? will it be a - playing out? will it be a smooth transition of power if these parti
bad. that s the first element. why is it the least bad? because - is it the least bad? because the other two were is it the least bad? because the other two were either is it the least bad? because the other two were either a - other two were either a nationalisation of credit suisse and the assumption by the swiss government of alternatives. splitting shutting down credit suisse, which is very difficult. so, among the three possible options, this is the least bad. haifa among the three possible options, this is the least bad. this is the least bad. how difficult will it be for this is the least bad. how difficult will it be for credit this is the least bad. how difficult will it be for credit suisse - this is the least bad. how difficult will it be for credit suisse ubs| will it be for credit suisse ubs to take over credit suisse? these are two huge banks. what s going to go into this kind of merger? it’s a go into this kind of merger? it s a short-term go into t
the girls i was on fire, they are entertaining to watch, superb. thea;r entertaining to watch, superb. they are doini entertaining to watch, superb. they are doing well. entertaining to watch, superb. they are doing well, they entertaining to watch, superb. they are doing well, theyjust need to lo. are doing well, theyjust need to go. they are doing well, theyjust need to go. they are all over them. i think it will be a go. they are all over them. i think it will be a goal go. they are all over them. i think it will be a goaljust go. they are all over them. i think it will be a goaljust before - it will be a goaljust before halftime it will be a goaljust before halftime. it it will be a goaljust before halftime. it is it will be a goaljust before halftime. it is coming. i halftime. it is coming. applause halftime. it is coming. applause. applause. just scored, you? we have played really well, first time the ball has gone down there, we have conceded but that is footba
congress still missed its goal. that s why they need some fiscal caulk like the interim spending bill to avoid a shut down on christmas eve. martha? here we go again. chad, thank you. with that, let s bring in ari fleischer, the former white house press secretary and fox news contributor. good to see you. welcome this afternoon. 18 republicans voted yes on this bill, which is 4,000 pages long and no one has had a chance to fully read. you hear nancy pelosi saying she hopes that this storm is motivation to get them all to give this a go. yeah, the best reason i ve heard any republican for why they voted yes on this has a 10% increase in defense spending. that is good news. we do need to boost our spending particularly when you look at the rise of china. martha, i m here to tell you washington is broken. there s no reason in the world appropriations should be lumped in to one gigantic take it or leave it bill. i m old enough to remember when