last night. i m not going to try to sum rise all of it and by now you probably saw the hearing or highlights or some coverage already. what we are aiming to do is report out the key investigative findings for you and what we learned from some of those witnesses. what we know from some of that significant testimony. witnesses i m going to get to in a few minutes. the other thing i want to go through in terms of what we ve learned is the damning evidence about the attack that day. that s one of the most important things, although there are many important things and that s what i m starting with right now at the top of our broadcast for you because whenever you hear that the nation watched something in realtime or we all lived through something together, the implication is that we saw the same things, that we understand some of the basic facts. that was the case in 9/11. we all saw the buildings fall. the insurrection built on a lie was quickly shrouded by another one and many a
facing a no confidence vote triggered by members of his own party. the question is, will the british leader now be removed from office? good morning. and welcome to way too early. on this monday, june 6th. i m jonathan lemire. thanks for joining us. we re coming off another weekend of deadly mass shooting across the country. in the past 72 hours, at least 17 people have been killed, nearly 70 were hurt and several of those victims have critical injuries. according to data from the gun violence archive, there were at least 13 mass shootings from friday, through sunday. the independent research group a defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people are shot. not including the shooter. two cities saw the worst of the violence. in philadelphia, three people died and 12 were wounded, late saturday night, in a popular downtown district. south street. investigators believe the shooting came after a fight between two men. and most of the victims, innocent bys
killed. phoenix, a 14-year-old girl was gunned down and 8 others shot at a strip mall in south carolina, where bullets tore through a graduation party, leaving one dead and others injured, six children. in texas, georgia, new york, and michigan. add those numbers up with the other mass shootings over the first months of 2022, and you get 240 mass shootings. let me say that again. 240 mass shootings already this year, in a year that s not even half over. what will republican governors, legislators, and members of congress do to stop the continued killing of our children in schools, our teenagers at malls, our mothers at graduation parties, our families in church, our grandmothers in supermarkets, our friends at country music festivals? it looks like nothing. nothing to speak of. i just want to know, this so-called party of life, which is anything but, when will they ever respect the life of those who are actually drawing a breath? i don t know. it looks like never. but i will
that the hearings will have pre-taped testimony from ivanka and jared kushner. and pence s inner circle. the committee has long promised it will share new information in these hearings. a bigger mission afoot. explain by committee member, adam shift. the american people, i think, know a great deal. already they ve seen a number of bombshells already. there is a great deal they haven t seen. perhaps most important is the public has not seen it woven together. how one thing led to another. how one line of effort to overturn the app ultimately led to terrible violence. the first non peaceful transfer of power in our history. we want to tell that comprehensive narrative. the hearings also expected to reveal the funding that helped field attack. an interview with vanity fair, jamie raskin said, quote, the most expressing discovery that money played in the role of financial motive with all these events to keep the money pouring. joining me now, eugene daniels, he s a politi
and with me now, cnn legal analyst, elliott williams, a former deputy assistant attorney general, and elliott, this is a friday night news dump, no question about it. no question. we know them well this this town. the justice department will not charge scavino, not charge mark meadows. they are charging peter navarro. how do you sort this out? you got to look at every case differently, jim, and set aside navarro and steve bannon who s also been charged. number one, the jobs each of these individuals held was different. steve bannon wasn t even a white house aide at the time of the conduct in question. right? number two, the nature of their behavior. there s at least the factual question as to whether meadows and scavino complied at least in part with the committee to a point that it just would have been hard to charge them with a crime. as a justice department, you want to be able to make the decision of do we think we could win this in front of a jury. it s just a cl