rand bill rwanda bill. the uk official opposition, party, shadow home secretary said these documents show that the rwanda scheme is an utter con and goes say the government going for a gimmick rather getting a grip. the wider picture around all this as there are already members of the conservative party who do not think rishi sunak is committed enough to the rwanda plan, we saw the former immigration minister i will sign over it might resign over itjust before christmas. there will be questions about what is committed to the planners and villages have reservations from the start. politically awkward from his own party do you think? party do you think? absolutely, there are others party do you think? absolutely, there are others on party do you think? absolutely, there are others on the - party do you think? absolutely, there are others on the right. party do you think? absolutely, there are others on the right of| party do you think? absolutely, . there are others on the rig
he got a lukewarm reception from the leadership. this is not possible to see a senate vote. senate majority leader harry reid is not allowing the kind of votes that would open up the vulnerable members to political commercials. and this is how he chooses to run the senate. there will be no budget. this is complete and utter con. senator conrad by all accounts is a serious guy. this is a very unserious thing he is doing. what he is doing have s having a show trial to shift debate. the debate right now, i think the republicans successfully argued on one hand you have paul ryan, arhats republicans in the republican party, more broadly, embraced paul hine plan and embrace the entitlement reform, made decisions that could have political consequences. then you have democrats this have done nothing. that is the current state of the debate. conrad wants to change it and wants democrats to say if they choose to, they are not bound to it because they won t vote. that they offered up simpson-bo
they wanted to take the direct representation out. they wanted to make sure that the state didn t have the direct representation. give you an example of the 17th amendme coming in today. obama s healthcare build would never see the light of day. a lot of things in washington would never see the light of day. why? it wouldn t be in the interest of the state. we know wilson was one of the worst in the history, but he has company. judge napolitano has his thoughts. the country was a disaster for the country constitution was a disaster for the country in the way it began with t woodrow wilson and moved up to f.d.r. the three of them together demonstrating utter con tempted for the natural law, the concept that individuals have natural lights that the