progress. we re going talk to senator bernie sanders shortly. but we begin tonight with new reporting that paints a remarkable picture of just how much evidence federal investigators may have to show the former president obstructed justice in the mar-a-lago document case. it comes tonight from the washington post. and the headline is stung. trump workers moved mar-a-lago boxes a day before fbi came for documents. new details including an alleged dress rehearsal for moving sensitive papers show a focus on donald trump s instructions and intent. now in a moment, we ll talk to legal analyst elie honig who joins us, but first enterprise reporter josh dorsey who shares a byline on the breaking story. can you just lay out the citizens at mar-a-lago based on your reporting? sure. so in may of 2022, federal prosecutors subpoena former president trump for all classified documents that he still has in his possession. after that period of time, some of the boxes that are in the stor
boxes a day before fbi came for documents. new details, including alleged dress for herself removing sensitive paper showy focus on donald trump s instructions and intent. in a moment we will talk to legal analyst elie honig, who joins us. but first, post political josh dorsey, who shares a byline on the breaking story. josh, can you just lay out the sequence of events at mar-a-lago based on your reporting? sure. so, in may of 2022, federal prosecutors subpoena former president trump for all classified documents that he still has in his possession. after that period of time, some of the boxes that are in the storage room are moved into other parts of mar-a-lago. one day before federal prosecutors come to pick up this subpoenaed material on june 3rd, the boxes are moved back into our storage room. on june 3rd, prosecutors are taken to the storage room and said, this is how all the classified documents are held. you cannot look through the boxes. but this is where they are
how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton, and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s probably hitting 80, 90. i m saying, you know, slow down . it was falling on deaf ears i don t think he responded at all so i basically reached the conclusion that somebody was going to die that night. sirens wail does your fire extinguisher work? it s out? i used it all up - i can t put the fire out. sirens wail watch out. the car has hit a tree. the driver was thrown into bushes nearby. he died from his injuries. i m very fortunate to have w
now on bbc news, our world: facial recognition fighting crime? across america, police are increasingly using facial recognition technology to fight crime. speaks spanish. can you open the door? you want law enforcement to have more tools at our disposal, not less. images can be fed into a database to search for matches and track people down but critics argue the use of this technology is opaque and could be inaccurate. if law enforcement knows how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s proba
if law enforcement knows how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton, and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s probably hitting 80, 90. i m saying, you know, slow down . it was falling on deaf ears i don t think he responded at all so i basically reached the conclusion that somebody was going to die that night. sirens wail does your fire extinguisher work? it s out? i used it all up - i can t put the fire out. sirens wail watch out. the car has hit a tree. the driver was thrown into bushes nearby. he died from his injuries. i m