witnessed them doing nothing while they need help. i have asked, are you all going to help, and they say, we can t. we can t get on to your property. they told us not to get on the property, and told us not to give them water. and i said, fine. then i turned around and we just kept helping people out. reporter: now the texas national guard denies those allegation, and the usdoj is working with other federal agencies to figure out what is going on, and if this is true, then the treatment is cruel, and inhumane. kate. rosa, thank you for being there and thank you for that. rahel. kate, days after a u.s. soldier bolted over the dmz and into north korea, the army is silent about his whereabouts. he was supposed to be back on a
The collapse of the business wiped clean investments from a lot of users, many of whom are still waiting on what remains on the company s estate to be redistributed.
is paused for seven days, according to the judge, so that the usdoj can appeal now about mifid preston. oh, preston is an abortion drug. that was approved by the fda back in 2000. it is the most common way to terminate a pregnancy in the united states. it has been used more than five million times since its approval. it s considered safe and effective, and medical groups say that the risk of death is quote non existent at the hearing. the preliminary injunction hearing happened last month. it was about four hours long and what s really fascinating. allison is that there is no question during this hearing that this judge was sympathetic towards the plaintiffs. the plaintiffs are coalition of. anti abortion groups. there s no question that he was sympathetic towards the plaintiffs, but there was nuanced there, the judge asked questions that appeared that the judge was skeptical to going as far as the plaintiffs wanted him to go or to be as aggressive as what the plaintiffs were asking th
according to the judge, so that the usdoj can appeal now about mifepristone omitted. preston is an abortion drug. that was approved by the fda back in 2000 . it is the most common way to terminate a pregnancy in the united states. it has been used more than five million times since its approval. it s considered safe and effective, and medical groups say that the risk of death is quote non existent at the hearing. the preliminary injunction hearing happened last month. it was about four hours long and what s really fascinating. allison is that there is no question during this hearing that this judge was sympathetic towards the plaintiffs. the plaintiffs are coalition of anti abortion groups question that he was sympathetic towards the plaintiffs, but there was nuanced there. the judge asked questions that appeared that the judge was skeptical to going as far as the plaintiffs wanted him to go or to be as aggressive as what the plaintiffs were asking them to do, which, in this case, they
that it is completely safe. now there s a pause to the texas order. the texas judge had to pause for editor posture that order for seven days, which means access to this drug is available right now. it is not been interrupted. now what is next? the usdoj has filed notice to appeal and the usdoj says on behalf of the fda that they re also reviewing the washington order, and i should mention that the plaintiffs, fred say that they re also digesting the order issued by the judge in texas, and they re also reviewing the order issued out of washington. fred and then rosa. why did the texas judge suspend the f d a approval of this drug take us through the judge s order. it s very interesting because this judge does not hold back in this order. in these 67 pages, he really rips apart the fda s approval of this drug, saying that they did not consider the risks to women and girls. but