Planning illegal acts. Why . Because according to former acting director an draw mccabe, he and Rod Rosenstein seriously discussed wearing a wire to record the president and invoking the 25th amendment to remove him from office. Discussion of the 25th amendment was simply rod raised the issue and discussed it with me in the context of thinking about how many other cabinet officials might support such an effort. The Deputy Attorney general offered to wear a wire into the white house. He said, i never get searched. Now, he was not joking. He was absolutely serious, and in fact he brought it up in the next meeting we had. To that, the president called mccabe disgraced and deranged. Then accusing those two top officials of quote, planning a very illegal act and got caught. This was the illegal and treasonous insurance policy in full action, says the president on twitter this morning. To be clear, mccabe and rosenstein might disagree on what and how was discussed but they definitely agree t
Capitol Fax com - Your Illinois News Radar » Illinois strict online privacy laws haven t stopped Facebook s investments here capitolfax.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from capitolfax.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Ninth Circuit Reverses Lower Court Ruling on Due Process Grounds
The Los Angeles Police Department obtained a search warrant from the Los Angeles Superior Court and seized more than 400 firearms from Wayne Wright’s residence and storage unit in Ventura County in 2004. That set off a long-term legal dispute between Wright and the LAPD that resulted in a recent federal appeals court decision regarding law enforcement’s obligations before deciding to destroy seized firearms.
In
Wright v. Beck, handed down Dec. 1, the U.S. Ninth Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling and found that a reasonable trier of fact could find that destruction of seized firearms without first providing notice to the owner is a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment’s right to due process.