is it robust? yes. is it uncompromising? yes. they asked the toughest question sometimes because that s what their brand is all about. as you know, in a world of finite, it s very hard when you have a half hour to tell the world s story. when you have an hour, you just have that extra beat to go deeper and asked the second and third follow up question. but i think you re talking about privatisation and the move currently is about economics. it s about the longer term protection of channel 4 is the government sees it. are you confident that you can keep that independence with all the talk of privatisation? look, we have to. we are.
story. when you have an hour, you just have that extra beat to go deeper and asked the second and third follow up question. but i think you re talking about privatisation and the move currently is about economics. it s about the longer term protection of channel 4 is the government sees it. share longer-term protection of channel 4 is the government sees it. is the government sees it. are you confident that is the government sees it. are you confident that you is the government sees it. are you confident that you can is the government sees it. are you confident that you can keep - is the government sees it. are you confident that you can keep that i confident that you can keep that independence with all the talk of privatisation? independence with all the talk of rivatisation? ., ., ~ ., ., . privatisation? look, we have to. we are. impartial privatisation? look, we have to. we are. impartial ourselves privatisation? look, we have to. we are. impartial ourselves on - privatis
in the conditioning of the national guard. as well as the speaker s role i overseeing capital security the presence and what that might look like going forward i do think they are going to get to the stirring up question. they re going to to get to dismissing the fbi today i thin david set the front. again we saw this back in january during the impeachment proceedings. we need to know if somebody in power was influencing all of this that would apparently be a nodded to the president and the speech that he gave that mornin
to those. in the lead-up to the wedding made a number of aides resign and number of them cry. tables perhaps turning on some of the stories but compelling viewing it was. steve: it was something. two hours ago. ainsley: it was. i watched the entire thing. steve: they re watching it today in england. benjamin hall. thank you very much. reporter: thank you. ainsley: brian, you want to weigh in? brian: i do. the racial inference, that is explosive. i think harry has to have a follow up question, who told you that and what did you tell your wife and what did you think when you heard it? did you come back at them? what do you think their problem was? i didn t see that but, she kicked it over to her husband my husband told me said that. steve: there was follow up from oprah. brian: i would think so. the suicidal was shocking. felt unprotected. you know what it is like to be in the headlines, you say to yourself is anyone defending me. i was constantly being attacked. the royal machine was no
swaying independents in favor of democrats. but also there is another point here. the white house has not cooperated as you pointed out, they ve withheld key documents and sought to block key witnesses from testifying before these house committees and so if they were to appear themselves and the obvious follow-up question is why won t you hand over the documents or let the other witnesses testify who have access to information that fills in some of the blanks from what we ve heard in the hearings thus far. and we ve seen the president wanted republicans to do at the on set which is make arguments on the merits, make arguments on the facts and that has gone out of the window because if you can t argue on the facts as you rightly pointed out, you attack the process. you see that in the letter. you mirror the language, abuse of power and i know you are but what am i and i think we ll continue to hear that until the senate does whatever the senate ends up doing.