the jury last met on monday when they heard testimony from robert costello, a former legal adviser to michael cohen. they hoped that robert costello would undermined costello might not actually have been the final witness. quote, the grand jury may hear from at least one more witness before being acts to vote on bringing charges against donald trump. sir for more than seven years jeremy saland joins me now. jeremy, good to have you on. and we don t know what happened. it could be nothing. somebody got sick or something. what is your read on the delay here? and just from your knowledge of process, what would it mean in terms of tomorrow and where they are in the timeline? first of all, i think we re all starting on the false premise that was set forth by the former president, that this and that the process is moving
that trump is using his lawyers as unwitting tools towards the obstruction of justice by getting them to sign a declaration, attesting to the federal government that there is nothing left that you are looking for. only to have said federal government find 100 different examples. here is the reporting from abc news on the lines of inquiry related to corcoran. sources familiar with the matter describe the six topics they indicate he was to a may 11th subpoena that stopped all remaining classified documents investigators have described this as key to trump s alleged scheme to obstruct the investigation. all of this to say, harry, the corcoran testimony here seems like a huge part of the whole case, to the extent there is one. yeah. at a minimum, even if they
scott is indicating that he s inching closer to announcing his old candidacy. it s a downer summit in the primary states in iowa and new hampshire, expecting to announce something soon. good news for senator scott, throwing this out into the rain, there s a lot of room to grow. polling has him just 4%, but trump is still right now running away with the nomination. you ve got a 14 lead, and it s been growing throughout the year, despite the growing threat of indictments. jen psaki is the former white house press secretary to president biden, host of msnbc inside with jim psaki, which debuted this weekend and was great. we have the embiid and both of them join you now. michael, let me start with you. obviously there is no real precedent here, we haven t had the indictment of the next president, but i m trying to add aaron burr, indicted and
there s not only danger to the former president, but even the public as well. so, they want to make sure it is done right. there s a lot of conversation. the defense may not know that the indictment is happening, if it does happen on a particular day. but one set of files are ready to go. there is no doubt that conversation will start. there has been a lot of talk from republicans donald trump and others, saying that this is a, quote unquote, politically motivated. trump says he is a rogue prosecutor. he s having a hard time with the grand jury. especially after the powerful testimony against him i guess, what is your read? i know you worked for justice on slot of calumny being heaped upon the current district attorney from manhattan, alvin bragg
horizon. what was everybody talking about and they re worried about 2020. those before we came clear of covid, all those things. in that respect, i don t think i m that certain about it. and you also think that people shouldn t underestimate the fact that getting indicted in bad, and might actually help hurt the person politically indicted, and that might shape the field. michael? would it be nice to think? i hope we re not just living in a past age with powdered wigs where that was true. i m not sure that we are, because i believe that even people that think they love donald trump in a long night, a lot of us are people that feel strongly about the law unlike him. they would see us go into court, they will see the fingerprints, the mugshots. this could happen in four or five different venues, in different parts of the country. plus, he s not exactly but