So what we could expect from the prosecution as they continue their questioning of daniels is why ultimately there in those closing weeks of october 2016 she decided to go, number one, with the 130,000 payment. An agreement to sign this nda with trump and cohen versus say going to an outside publication and having her story going public there in the closing days of the 2016 election. But then we could also likely hear the prosecution ask her about her further understanding between her conversations with Keith Davidson, who was her attorney at the time, about what she understood that this agreement entailed. And what led over the course of 2017 into 2018 to her ultimately going public with her story after it was first reported about in the Wall Street Journal and sitting down for an interview with 60 minutes in which she detailed her allegations. Donald trump, we know from testimony from david pecker, previously last week, had suggested that donald trump was irate when she went public a
Contentious day in court Stormy Daniels begin are detailing or alleged sexual encounter with donald trump and the Hush Money Payment to buy her silence Defense Attorneys please do note time hitting back during a very combative crossexaminatio n, Attacking Daniels credibility and prompting her to testify under oath that she hates trump and wants to see him held accountable for the next hour, well take you inside the courtroom from gavel to gavel will break down all of todays most Important Development and look ahead to whats next welcome to our viewers in the United States and around the world. Im wolf blitzer with a Special Report in Situation Room the trump trial today our coverage begins tonight in new york, where the trump Hush Money Trial, just wrap for the day after the prosecution put one of its star witnesses on the stand, Stormy Daniels the alleged affair, the Hush Money Payments, and daniels credibility, all very much under the microscope for the jury first, lets go to see as
Anything else, this man was not necessarily that person. However, my point was just to say that you can be lowlevel george, you can be low on the org chart and still be the guy who goes to moscow and was sending plenty of emails to people who were high level. High level, theres now it seems like there may be a fair number of people, including high level steve, mr. Bannon, who is for the first time, this is the first moment in which highlevel steve is being dragged into this investigation. First time weve heard his name in a material way and that story may be developing. Let me jump in on this. The point is that when you want to do something sensitive like this, its something akin to an intelligence operation which was what this was on the russian side and i would argue in ways even on the trump side. You do send a lowlevel guy. You dont send the senior guy. You send the low level guy because he attracts less attention. You do that with purpose. So im very much validating johns point bu
their statement says, hey, this is settled. let s put it behind us, yeah, for you, not necessarily for the rest of us who may have been wandering around in front of our bedroom ring cam and who knows what was going on in 2017 and 2018. who in ukraine has video of us if we used ring not just in the front door area, but inside of our house which i m sure plenty of people did. what kind of privacy protections are in place, are there any when it comes to privacy laws? amazon is promising that that s going to going through an increase of security and third-party multi-step authentication and things like that, but that s a hollow promise to people who already have no idea whether or not their video or image has been breached, is out there. possibly in eastern europe somewhere and uncontrolled. once you let out video like that, you can t unring the bell. so going forward and fixing
leaks. he was holding a bat. let me explain that. just a minute. there was a picture with a bat that someone had put together. right. he reposted, did he not? so you re a witness. answer the question. i m about to answer the question. did he repost? however ill-advised that was, reposting that does that mean he reposted it? he took it down when he realized what was in the photo. i was stabbed in the back but took the knife out. you can t unring the bell, as judges will say, once the evidence is before a jury. you can t unring that bell. you can t pull it back. everybody has that image. donald trump knows that. they have the image of the baseball bat. that s one of the reasons the new york post ran it yesterday. but, you re right, thank you so much. he tries to limit and they called trump deranged, the new