yet, tim scott, unmarried, no kids. nobody s even mentioned it. what do you make of that? would be the first bachelor in the white house since i think you can, so certainly, it s been a, we ll give kudos to our colleague tom giannis, who asked him if he s stating anybody. and it seemed as if the answer was, he might be. so, i think it s important that we asked the question simply because i remember when cory booker was campaigning in iowa during the 2020 cycle. he, at that, point was dating someone but people asked him the same question. why aren t you married? if i flip that question on its head the, as you did step, and applied that to a female candidate, certainly, i don t think i could even fathom it because the way that we ve seen electorates respond to female candidates already, is looking at them as number two, sestak and their demand, vice presidents, cabinet members. what have you? i remember, this kind of polling when kamala harris was running as a presidential candidate he
why didn t anybody want to marry her? why doesn t she have children? does she not like children? yet tim scott, unmarried, no kids. nobody has even mentioned it. what do you make of that? would be the first bachelor in the white house since i think buchanan. so certainly, it s been a while. i will say, give kudos to our colleague tom giannis, who did ask him if he s at least dating anybody. and it seemed like the answer is he might be. so, i think it s important we ask the questions, simply because i remember when cory booker was campaigning in iowa during the 2020 cycle. he was at that point dating someone, but people ask him the same question, why aren t you married? if i flip that question on its head though, as you did, steph, and apply that to a female candidate, certainly, i don t think i could even fathom it. because the way we ve seen electorates respond to female candidates already is looking at them as number twos, secondary to man, vice presidents, cabinet members,
different. it s much more vicious and it seems more calculated. these days these gangs are reckless. real reckless. it s not organized no more. it used to be structured. no women, no kids. now it s a free-for-all. a free-for-all? and attitudes toward crime and liberal enclaves, that has given gangs the incentive to use younger kids to commit some of the worst acts of violence. that is new. the gangs are also getting more sophisticated in their recruiting even using social media disguising themselves as public interest organizations. so in a nation facing recession, criminal gangs are now a growth industry. young people in cities like chicago know they have nothing to lose. the floyd protests took away all inhibitions. young people were encouraged, in fact, to be loud, to be disrespectful. they were told that the country
different. it s much more vicious and iittc seems more calculated now these days. these these gangs arereckless reckless, real reckless.eckless. it s not organized no more . it used to be structure there. no women, no kids. no w it s just a free for a free for all and permissive attitudes toward crimera and liberal enclaves that s given gangl ens the incentive ue to use younger kids to commit some the worst acts of violence that s new . the gangs are also getting more sophisticated in their recruiting, even using social media, disguising themselves as public interest organizations ass. so in a nation facinga recession, criminanationl gangse now a growth industry. young people in cities like chicago know they have nothing to lose. ng the floyd protests took away all all inhibitions. young people were encouraged, in fact, to be loud, to be disrespectful. e