us. do something. just do something. for god s sake, do something. after columbine, after sandy hook, after charleston, after orlando, after las vegas, after parkland, nothing has been done. this time, that cannot be true. this time we must actually do something. they issue we face is one of conscience and common sense. the second amendment, like all other rights, is not absolute. it was justice scalia who wrote, and i quote, like most rights, the right of the second amendment the rights granted by the second amendment are not unlimited. not unlimited. they never have been. it comes to the carnage we are willing to accept. how many more innocent american lives must be taken before we say enough? enough. let there be no mistake about the silent collage kaletra that gun violence leaves behind. imagine being that little girl, that brave little girl in uvalde, who smeared blood off of her murdered friends body, on her own face, to lie still among the corpses in her classroom to
an exceptionally able job was an acquittal on the single count they brought in a few hours. then there is the so-called unmasking scandal, which has nothing to do with wearing masks. this completely manufactured fox news scandal is another one of trump s deep spate conspiracies. the nsa forwarded all surveillance reports that included michael flynn s name to the white house where flynn s name was promptly unmasked. the names of the people who unmasked general flynn have been publicized. joe biden, john brennan, jim comey. your reaction? it was the greatest political crime in the history of our country. why has there been such limited coverage of the flynn unmasking when this is what the president of the united states has referred to as the biggest political scandal in history of the united states of america? none of that was true. but imagine being a fox news viewer and having a cast of characters pushing that line on
masks. this completely manufactured fox news scandal is another one of trump s deep spate conspiracies. the nsa forwarded all surveillance reports that included michael flynn s name to the white house where flynn s name was promptly unmasked. the names of the people who unmasked general flynn have been publicized. joe biden, john brennan, jim comey. your reaction? it was the greatest political crime in the history of our country. why has there been such limited coverage of the flynn unmasking when this is what the president of the united states has referred to as the biggest political scandal in history of the united states of america? none of that was true. but imagine being a fox news viewer and having a cast of characters pushing that line on you over and over four years. a supposed grave crime is that trump s first national security
to unmasked general flynn when the nsa, the fbi, and the csi had done their due diligence and didn t think they needed it. that s exactly the underlying question. is there a political behind thi this? but the person to watch here is samantha power, and it s because when you re looking, my information is that the intelligence reports are basically very telling. while we might not get a lot from these closed-door meetings, to use a big lot of lawyerly terms, i think you will see that it s in this intelligence report that that s where they re going to find a lot of this information. do you think they emailed someone and said hey, look what i ve got her? i think that the intelligence committee will have that information, and the person to watch there is samantha. some other new separate this afternoon is that dianne feinstein said she had spoken to special counsel robert miller and he was okay with donald trump, jr., and paul mena for testifying in an open
to the bottom of this, of all of it? first, it is ironic now, eric, looking back, no one on the democratic side was raising cain with all the informationir from that british sources put out there. let s get that as a framer.ng with that said, eric, a lot of methods and capabilities now being discussed behind closed doors. as catherine said, going to do a few things. i have been in closed hearings, closed hearings allow you to disclose up to the logical classification level. not everything, but up to a level of what methodology was used and not only that, but the authorities were exactly. i have run these sorts of operations, and let me tell you something, ten years ago eric: let me ask you, does that mean they can say who unmasked general flynn? absolutely. it will be that level. because it will go down to exactly which keystroke unmasked which name, which tells you exactly who struck that keystroke. more importantly, were talking about, even if that was authorized, if you take