home her cancer waiting for her she used to have a flatmate until a short while but she moved out because she was afraid to get into trouble with the authorities herself friends who suddenly turned their back that s also something better had to get used to. it. i know there are many people like me they die as so-called civil death but i don t want to accept this while i try to resist for the rest of my life i will fight for everyone who experiences injustice and unlawfulness and i hope to get back my job in the meantime only if we resist can we keep the hope of life. and that s why the two g. leaving for the next. one here are though she had a well paid job as a civil suit and she has become an activist fighting to get back. the report there from g.w.
justice department at this point to say i should have reviewed this, it should have gone in front of the lawyers who are not just concerned with the letters in the executive order, but what s being said around it, the context, and more importantly how it s being implemented. i think she sees a very serious constitutional problem. it s her obligation to say something. nobody else in that administration is. professor i think that s right. how unusual is this? how uncharted waters are we in? it s very unusual. usually when somebody refuses to enforce the orders of the president, it involves a very, very clear case of unconstitutionality/unlawfulness , she s wrong when she says it s the job of the justice department to make sure what is happening is right, or i think also your other guest is wrong, to preserve the integrity of the justice department and the credibility before the courts. that may be what they would like to see happen, but her job is to enforce the law unless it i
could the city of san francisco say we are not going to do background checks on fire arms and not pay federal taxes? where does it stop? and what s the federal government doing about it? there is another woman who is murdered in the beginning of july down in texas by her companion who had also had several convictions and had been deported repeated times. that s another city where they have made the decision that to encourage cooperation from the illegal immigrants who are in the community they decided not to deport these bad felon immigrants. i don t understand why they think illegal immigrants in the country who are law abiding other than the unlawfulness of their entry won t report on the felons who are next door to them if they don t give sanctuary to everybody. well they are not going to
could the city of san francisco say we are not going to do background checks on fire arms and not pay federal taxes? where does it stop? and what s the federal government doing about it? there is another woman who is murdered in the beginning of july down in texas by her companion who had also had several convictions and had been deported repeated times. that s another city where they have made the decision that to encourage cooperation from the illegal immigrants who are in the community they decided not to deport these bad felon immigrants. i don t understand why they think illegal immigrants in the country who are law abiding other than the unlawfulness of their entry won t report on the felons who are next door to them if they don t give sanctuary to everybody. well they are not going to
the line-up of justices is exactly what we expected going into oral arguments. yesterday s decision was about interpreting federal law, and this is about the constitution. and you tend to see these idealogical prakbreakdowns more when you get to constitutional issues. secondly you undoubtedly heard a lot of ink spilled on whether the chief justice would join the majority here so he wasn t on the wrong side of history. i can tell you the lawyers here involved in that case never thought that would happen. it s really amazing as we re watching all of this and we re seeing on the left-hand side of the screen the live images of the supporters who have gathered on the outside. i still have with me kevin bullard, and kevin, as we hear justice kennedy writing about that one thing we know that loving v. virginia did do it stripped away the unlawfulness