conclusion of his evidence giving session, day two of all of that. the press assembled at the doorway is, the reporters and camera crews, because the prince has been watching some of the other witnesses being cross examined in the last little while. we expect him to depart after a second day of cross examination at the high court, just like yesterday going through so many of the 33 articles they are focusing on, with the princess saying the critical information had to come from phone hacking and the cross examination for mirror group newspapers saying they could have come from several legitimate other ways. that tussle has been going on both yesterday and today. of course, we expect to see his departure and the case itself continues because the prince, of course, one of four people bringing this test case and they will be going through similar articles and evidence with the other three, but so much attention on the prince, his witness statement yesterday detailed at length th
yesterday, the detail as you mentioned in these newspaper articles. mentioned in these newspaper articles, and these articles at the heart articles, and these articles at the heart of articles, and these articles at the heart of his articles, and these articles at the heart of his case could be his personal heart of his case could be his personal life, his school life at eton, personal life, his school life at eton, his personal life, his school life at eton, his time in the army too, he says eton, his time in the army too, he says the eton, his time in the army too, he says the specifics in those articles. says the specifics in those articles, the detail, the times of the conversation could only have come the conversation could only have come from the conversation could only have come from illegal, unlawful newsgathering methods. that is something the publisher has denied. we also something the publisher has denied. we also heard earlier this afternoon from princ
in central london now. no prince harry, that was expected by his side, certainly of the court room. they had said he wasn t coming because david sherborne, his barrister, is working his way through this fairly lengthy three hour opening statement about this part of the case. to give you a bit of background, we have had a generic case, the basic case against the mirror group, case, the basic case against the mirrorgroup, now case, the basic case against the mirror group, now we are onto specific cases, the first being prince harry. what is clear is there is no single bit of evidence that proves these newspapers breached his privacy. but what there is is an admission from mirror group newspapers in 2015 that this sort of unlawful newsgathering, gathering information did take place. unlike newspaper stories were written as a result of it. what david sherborne said was how likely was it that had happened but that prince harry wasn t one of the people he was targeted by the journalists? was