primetime can t find a single victim here. it doesn t look like anybody was physically injured. doesn t look like the irs was cheated. where s the crime? a lawyer paid a woman and a business reimbursed the lawyer? that s it? then the company filed the payment as a legal expense and just threw it in the filing cabinet? but, calling a payment to a lawyer a real expense instead of a legal reimprisonment is worse than hurt here in new york. never ever put your payments in the wrong ledger. bragg calls that falsifying a misdemeanor with since when did democrats become sticklers for bookkeeping. what letter did hunter file the chinese diamond under. the biden administration took millions from china before an election, lied about it, didn t pay taxes on it. that seems a little worse. the trump organization isn t even publicly traded. and no campaign funds were used. what was trump supposed to do? write a giant sweep sized check and hand it to stormy in times square. trump is a b
manhattans, he will face a 34-count indictment related to hush-money payment made in the run-up to the election, jen psaki says democrats might want to consider restraint. where does that leave democrats? what should they be doing about the indictment news? let me start with what i don t think you should be doing. as much as you may want to, now is not lock them up t-shirts and mugs, that is what trump and his supporters would do. now is not the time to celebrate, brag, predict outcome of the legal cases. if you can, i would put your head down and stay out ever it for now. greg: moderate democrats have doubts about the case. it is a very, very sad day for america, very sad day, especially when people believe the rule of law or justice is not working the way it is supposed to and biassed, we can t have that. no one should be above the law. no one should be a target of the law. it will lead to political theater. greg: grab your bucket and mop, the media is wetting their p
with a felony? because stormy got paid while trump was running for president. bragg is saying trump should have called it a campaign expense. so bragg s frankensteining the misdemeanor into a campaign finance felony. but it had nothing to do with the campaign. trump was suburbing an extortionist to protect his family. he would have done that if he wasn t running for president and probably had before. when you are rich, it s called a nuisance lawsuit. go away. since democrats think everything is political, they can t imagine somebody doing something to protect their family. everything always has to be about politics with them because it is. that s why the last manhattan d.a. never pulled the trigger. why didn t you charge the hush money case? why didn t you ever charge it in 201, 2019, 2020? well, chuck, i don t want to get into the deliberations that might be covered by grand jury material but as i believe you know.
and no campaign funds were used. what was trump supposed to do? write a giant sweep sized check and hand it to stormy in times square. trump is a billionaire being extorted by a porn actress. of course go through a lawyer. do you think bill clinton skeletalled with all those women without a lawyer? by the way which ledger did bill clinton file his settlements under. all that hush money that congress paid out those weren t filed as campaign expenses. now, if you want to see a crime, look at alvin bragg s office? how did cnn know what was inside the sealed indictment? the night the story broke. i m told by my sources this is 34 counts of falsification of business records. jesse: braggens office leaked the indictment to cnn. unlawful grand jury disclosure. that s a felony. there is actually more evidence that bragg committed a felony than trump did. so, how is trump even charged
saying the case will fall apart when michael avenatti, from prison, is telling you michael cohen is not credible, that is noteworthy. you haven t heard the other side of the case, you have seen what the grand jury heard. here is why you ought to sign off on the ham sand wwich for n. bob costello has more they have not seen. this case with john edwards fell apart in a huge way and he gathered a million dollars from different donors to get money to pay his hush money from different people and they couldn t nail him with that. greg: he is not trump, he doesn t create derangement. judge, will there be a gag order and will the former president respect it? jeanine: i think it is a sad day when i watch the president both get on the plane and then