Wilson will be absent and brighten will provide the board with any legal advice at the controller is gary the boards legal assistant im Cynthia Goldstein the boards executive director were joined by were joined by representatives from the city departments that have cases before this board. Sitting at the table is Scott Sanchez representing the Planning Department and Planning Commission and gene that the department of public works for street use please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or Business Card to the clerk. Speaker cards and pe
Hasz, commissioner johnck, commissioner johns, commissioner matsuda will be absent today. Directors announcements . Good afternoon. I would like to mention the Mission Moratorium which of course did not move forward yesterday. What i wanted to let you know is that we are continuing and will continue and i made this commitment on behalf of the department that we will continue to do our work in the mission 2020 plan which we have been working for some time with a series of neighborhood groups to work towards stabilizing the demographics of that neighborhood while the neighborhood is growing. Its something that we have committed to and the mayor has committed to and committed the staff over the next year to make that plan a reality. Its a Land Use Plan and not a zoning plan per say but a plan that tries to stabilize the mission through tenant, counseling, eviction control, acquisition of sites for Affordable Housing, acquisition for existing buildings for rent control buildings to maintai
Wish to address the commission on nonagenda decided amends interest seeing and hearing none Public Comment is closed. Under Department Matters directors announcements. Commission tim frye the directors report was included there our packet happy to we are any questions should you have them. Seeing none, commissioners we can move to item 2 past fence amazements. Good morning tim Frye Department staff a few items to sharing share last week the board of appeals heard the brt certificate of appropriateness issued by in commission no november and the board of appeals heard from the appellant as well as mta and the planning Department Staff on behalf of the hpc the board of appeals had a number of questions as you recall the appeal around the removal of the trolley poles and also the removal of trees as part of project the board of appeals did raise concerns about the removal of all the trolley poles and the line of questioning was towards the direction of wanting to save more but the board o
Okay. We are on brown. Good afternoon, well call this meeting back to order. The Historic Preservation. City clerk good afternoon. We are back in order. Please silence all cell phones and when speaking please speak directly into microphone and please state your name for the record. We are on item 9. Item 9 brown 4155 57590744 landmark designation work Program Informational presentation regarding three recent communityinitiated nominations for landmark designation pursuant to article 10 of the planning code. This informational item was calendared at the hpcs request following Public Comment at its regularly scheduled hearing on june 18, 2014 in support of article 10 designation of 182198 gough street, the r. L. Goldberg building. This item also includes information pertaining to two Additional Properties recently nominated by the community for article 10 landmark designation. Sf 91234 good afternoon, commissioners, mary Brand Department staff. Im here to discuss issues nominated, 182, 1
The exhibition of queenian. It replaces the familys earlier farm house moved to the dairy in the 1970s. The was located in an area. The building was included in several recent Historic Buildings and 1986 architectural is survey. Early july a nearby resident requested the building be designated as a local landmark and provided its history with association with the family. Based on the review the building may qualify which appears architecturally significant. The building may also qualify due to its association with the pioneering language lang and connected. This morning i received a letter of support for designation from a member of the public. In the case report are several options for the hpc to consider including add anything or all of the properties to the landmark designation program. Requesting more information from project applicants and directing staff to prioritize any or all of these properties over all the properties on the work program. This concludes my presentation and im