They say constitutional privilege. And as a member of the senate, this is not a question. Im speaking to my colleagues. I find myself in a quandary here about being denied those particular documents because i cannot find any assertion of the privilege. These documents just suddenly appeared and somebody had put constitutional privilege on the page and wiped out all the text that was on the page. And my understanding is that there is ordinarily a process for getting to that determination that allows for ultimately a judicial review. And we have failed to get subpoenas out of the committee for documents, so we cant trigger it that way. And there is no apparent assertion of executive privilege that i can find in the record of how this particular paper got here. So i just wanted to establish some of the basic ground rules of executive privilege with you because i think we agree on that. I think thats basically commonly agreed and put that into the context of what we are looking at and part
Just say you dont want people to have human rights. Yes, i understood the question then and the answer now and the question now and the answer now. To be 100 accurate, you were concerned about whether i was involved in the program that two other nominees have been involved in and the report, the senator feinstein produced the justice departments report. They showed that i was not. The program and the dracraftingf the program for detainees. Judge kavanaugh, thats not the question. Do you see me asking whether you crafted the program . I didnt. I asked you about your involvement in the haynes. Crafting . And you went further and you violated the second rule i gave to every witness. You answered more than i asked. I told the truth. You volunteered more information than i asked and you went further than you should of. The three specific instances that i given you. You clearly were involved in questions of rules and combatants. I understood the question then and now. My answer about that pr