Their physical size is narrower, and also to make machines more accountable and more clear in how they work. [inaudible]. Its very low doses but thats an excellent question and i thought somebody would probably ask that. So, the United States Preventative Services task force in 2009 came out with a proposal to revise guidelines saying that perhaps women aged 40 to 50, theres no cost benefit really for that age group in terms of having mammogram of average risk, so recommended that women start mammography at age ao where the benefits really out weigh the risk, you dont have 40 years left in your life span at that point perhaps, you have 30, youre at a less vulnerable stage of life so there are a lot more benefits for life, your Breast Cancer risks are higher, so you know, the age 40 to 50, theres still a lot of debate about that and women need to discuss this with their own health care providers, but recent research has found that women who are at high risk of Breast Cancer because of b
Only option, its worth that added risk because the alternative is really dangerous sometimes, but we want to ensure those scans and those medical imaging tests are the most appropriate, are at the right dose, especially for kids are a lot of times, they dont know how to scale down for a childsize body and the machines may not calibrate or have clear directions on how to make that happen so in our own lives, we can ask our health care provides, are there safer alternative, mri or ultrasounds for doing this test, and then if you have kids and they need a test, ensure and ask questions about the safest dose and if they have machines that can calibrate to kids, and then we have to see these changes with the laws so if fda has proposals out for medical imaging around kids so you know how to downsize a radiation dose for kids who is smaller, their physical size is narrower, and also to make machines more accountable and more clear in how they work. [inaudible]. Its very low doses but thats a
They all sound like theyre good because they all sound like, you know, safety of chemicals in cosmetic, they all have those words but they dont really all do that so i think its also important as youre thinking about these things to go to a Reputable Organization that you trust is going to give you real information and support the kinds of laws that theyre supporting rather than one thats maybe a bill posed by the industry that, guess what, wants to be selfregulating. Okay, so now we are moving to the driveway, and this is really interesting because we think about low emissions cars as being really important for maybe Climate Change but they also might be important for Breast Cancer because when fuel is burning and you guys are familiar with chemicals that, you know, come bust, lower emissions vehicle, one thats more efficient may reduce these pahs in our air and especially in urban areas reduce exposures to those compounds which is really pornts, so thinking about hybrid or electric,
Dose for kids who is smaller, their physical size is narrower, and also to make machines more accountable and more clear in how they work. [inaudible]. Its very low doses but thats an excellent question and i thought somebody would probably ask that. So, the United States Preventative Services task force in 2009 came out with a proposal to revise guidelines saying that perhaps women aged 40 to 50, theres no cost benefit really for that age group in terms of having mammogram of average risk, so recommended that women start mammography at age ao where the benefits really out weigh the risk, you dont have 40 years left in your life span at that point perhaps, you have 30, youre at a less vulnerable stage of life so there are a lot more benefits for life, your Breast Cancer risks are higher, so you know, the age 40 to 50, theres still a lot of debate about that and women need to discuss this with their own health care providers, but recent research has found that women who are at high risk
Emissions vehicle, one thats more efficient may reduce these pahs in our air and especially in urban areas reduce exposures to those compounds which is really pornts, so thinking about hybrid or electric, were all lucky enough to take Public Transit and reduce those overall exposures or yeah . I believe so, is that true . Yes, my science advisors, thats why theyre here. [inaudible]. Yeah. There are a lot of carcinogens in diesel exhaust, yeah. [inaudible]. Well, youre still seeing an oil that combusts, some of them we know burn more cleanly than others but if its combusting, you end up with productions of combustion, it may not be better for pollution on the other side, depending on how clean the air burns and thats a theme we end up talking about a fair bit unfortunately is that bio doesnt always mean its safer, it can, it can definitely mane were reducing destruction of Greenhouse Gases but it can still make bad things outs of good ingredients if you know what i mean, another outdoor