Mentioned to the taken place possible street unit has been renovated and something the tenant agrees the unit is in perfect condition. Theres true but theres nothing where the owner represented to the tenant tights quote unquote a legal unit. If he was aware why did he rent the property. Im awarethanasia thats an obligation of the landlord as the Mayors Office has recognized there are tens of thousands of illegal unit throughout the city and im not aware of any instance or provision of an ordinance that says if its an illegal unit the landlord must inform the tenant of that and okay. Thank you. Mr. Duffey. Good evening, commissioners joel duffey dbi. First of all, id like to wish commissioner hwang all the best in her future its been a pleasure knowing you at the board and youve been thorough in my opinion which i like i like your fairness and its been a pleasure working with you best of luck in the future. On this case commissioners theres a lot of mostly parts reading the brief and i
Issued that it was legalizing did second floor a back to the residential use and the Building Permits state that we had one residential unit with is commercial back to residential use with one dwelling unit. We signed off that permit and issued a certificate of completion. And the description on the certificate of final completion on polk street legalized it back to the first floor commercial number of apartments one and i think going from the i noticed on the 3 r report on the brief dbi on the 3 r report had it as one dwelling unit over commercial that was part of the brief. The latest complaint and i didnt get a chance to speak with the building inspector that was filed in june a legal unit put behind the commercial space the building inspector did reach from the twoug of june to the 21st of july hes still doing the research and the property profile shows an r3 it can be a singlefamily or separate unit and saying the legal description defines two residential spaces on the ground floo
The owners on the polk street in San Francisco will apply to the department of building inspection to permanently roach the plumbing so we need a Building Permit before the plumbing permit you could apply for your plumbing permit and in addition we would like to see a permit i did research on the building today and i will speak about the building inspection complaint on my research for the building in 1994 application ill put that on the overhead. This was no so this was a permit in the 4 and the dbi issued that it was legalizing did second floor a back to the residential use and the Building Permits state that we had one residential unit with is commercial back to residential use with one dwelling unit. We signed off that permit and issued a certificate of completion. And the description on the certificate of final completion on polk street legalized it back to the first floor commercial number of apartments one and i think going from the i noticed on the 3 r report on the brief dbi o
This was no so this was a permit in the 4 and the dbi issued that it was legalizing did second floor a back to the residential use and the Building Permits state that we had one residential unit with is commercial back to residential use with one dwelling unit. We signed off that permit and issued a certificate of completion. And the description on the certificate of final completion on polk street legalized it back to the first floor commercial number of apartments one and i think going from the i noticed on the 3 r report on the brief dbi on the 3 r report had it as one dwelling unit over commercial that was part of the brief. The latest complaint and i didnt get a chance to speak with the building inspector that was filed in june a legal unit put behind the commercial space the building inspector did reach from the twoug of june to the 21st of july hes still doing the research and the property profile shows an r3 it can be a singlefamily or separate unit and saying the legal descrip
Conversion. The permit holders is seeking to convert it to nonresidential use if the intent does not amount to a demolition then thats a conversion it occurs when the residential unit under go a use as defined by planning code or a change of occupancy as regulated by the planning code of any dwelling unit to nonresidential use in zoning controls on the removal of zoning units. The unit is a dwelling unit as denied in the planning code. Quote a room or scoot of two or more rooms thats designed or occupied by one family doing its own cooking and only having one kitchen the San Francisco Building Code riverside requires a Building Permit to convert it to a nonresidential use and a Building Permit as i stated earlier therefore the plumbing permit cant trigger a conversion although mandatory review is not required for the non residential units the Planning Commission can consider applications to remove dwellings at discretionary review holds the permit holder had applied for the correct per