The High Court of Calcutta has held that the Court under Section 9 of the A&C Act can punish for the disobedience of its order. It held that its power under Section 9 is similar to the Civil Court s.
The High Court of Calcutta has held that constitution of arbitral tribunal is not a bar on a party s right to approach Section 9 Court for implementation of its order.The bench of Justice Sabyasachi.
With another week gone at the Supreme Court of India, Live Law is back with its Supreme Court Weekly Digest, dedicated to keeping our readers abreast of the most recent legal developments in the .
Observing that the case indicates "pathetic lacklustre manner" in which Union government is dealing with implementation of its orders, the Armed Forces Tribunal s (AFT) principal bench has directed.
A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Uday Kumar while deciding a Writ Petition in the case of Md. Farid Vs. Union of India & Ors has held.