And how are democrats going to sell a hot plate of stinky doom when people are getting relief. Believe it or not, thats their plan. Its not the environment for democrats to throw the brakes on economic momentum. When the economy tanks after a republican administration, thats when the democrats can offer the salve of socialism to heal their wounds. But when we are on the upswing, the last thing want to hear from nancy pelosi is this. Well have to repeal and replace the bill. Kennedy reef place fit with what . Hike the tax rates back up . If the democrats dont have a plan, and throwing water on a birthday cake, they will lose if the indicators remain positive. Its the economy, stupid. You dont promise is to repeal something if you dont have a plan, and you dont have a plan, and taxes may be the only thing they get right and the only thing they need to stay in house tour beyond 2018. If they can offer a positive, track tall tax package they would have plenty of takers. Until then if the p
To them and slung them out. Because theyve taken down major, they took down cameron, two great leaders, neither of whom stood up to them. All this on the day Michel Barnier has come to downing street to warn us that the time has come to choose. Without the Customs Union and outside the Single Market, barriers to trade and goods and services are unavoidable. Not avoidable . We will ask lord lamont if theresa mays vision for brexit is getting clearer or cloudier. Also tonight. Look how far women have come in the last one million years. Tonight, on the eve of the suffragette centenary, we ask our panel what we got right, what we got wrong and where were heading now. Good evening. Suddenly, everyones stopped mincing their words. As the government clarified there would be no Customs Union post brexit. ,Michel Barnier, the chief eu negotiator arriving in town, said that would cause unavoidable barriers to trade. Out the bunting . As for the rest call them remainers or soft brexiteers or what
Life delinda for british Prime Ministers questions i. Each week the house of commons is in session we bring you Prime Minister David Cameron taking questions from members of the house of commons live wednesday mornings on cspan2. We invite your participation via twitter using the hashtag pmqs. Prior to question i members are finishing up other business. Now live to the floor of the british house of commons. As i just stated very clearly that this is ministers will invite others to discuss the bill further. Question to the Prime Minister. Question number one mr. Speaker. Thank you mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker this morning i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and in addition to my duties in this house, i shall have further such meetings later today. The plan was published this week shows prospects for young people have deteriorated since the conservatives came into conflict. In the Prime Minister explain why the reducing opportunity young people further by removing thereby
Will to fund frontline forces as constituents asked me to ask Prime Minister . I think my honorable friend is right. Because we made the pledge in our manifesto that there be no further reductions in Armed Services numbers, and i think thats right. With a visit to present him with the extra commitment we are making throughout this parliament we can now have a strategic defense and security review that looks at options for how to make this country even safer. The way the chancellor of the defense secretary have set it up is to make sure we include in this looking at options for counterterrorism, for intelligence and security as well as defense assets to make sure we do everything we can at this time of heightened security to keep a britain is safe. A combination of changes made to the state pension in 1995 and 2011 will mean that many women born in the 1950s will not have the kind of retirement that they hoped for. Given a senior Civil Servants and the judges and even members of Parliam
Otherwise would be required to pay and might be subject to further costs and Court Proceedings that is forgiven and wiped from the books. But yes, its meaningful relief for american consumers. And the other point that senator warren has made to me thats wrort making is every time we then correct practices, the same things dont happen going forward, and you can expect the same money being saved each year in the future but its hard to quantify that. It is hard to quantify, but every time a consumer gets a fair Mortgage Loan rather than a predatory one a great deal of help has been created in terms of a wealthbuilding enterprise versus a wealthsfriping one. I want to turn to the subject of payday loans, and youre engaged in laying out a policy framework not yet a draft regulation and taking feedback on it. In oregon we proceeded to establish a pretty rigorous framework, reestablishing a user cap on the full range of loans consumer loans, payday loans, because wed seen the migration of one