right to lawyer, if one can t afford one, one will be presented for you, anything you say can be used in court, the usual miranda warning and that s normally given whenever anyone is arrested and if the government doesn t do that, if the police don t give that you warning, then anything you say cannot be used in court. but there is an exception. the law says basically if it s more important to protect public safety to get information about whether there are continuing threats, then you can question someone without the miranda warning and you can still use the evidence in court. this has been true in recent terrorism cases. you think about the underwear bomber case, abdulmutallab, the government questioned him without a miranda warning, the courts ruled that evidence as part of this public safety exception. so, they will say are there any other people working with you? do you have any other explosives out there? is there another danger to the public? and the people who will ask the ques
tonight. howhow much did this cost us, trace. the feds first awarded the company 25-million-dollar contract bill. that was for 150 of those high tech image scanners. the naked scanner you were talking about. and then a year later they awarded them another 16-million-dollar contract for an additional 100 scanners. so, the total budget was for about $42 million but as the government often does, things ran a bit overbudget and with installation it cost about $90 million. but the head of t.s.a. says body scanners work. and he points to the underwear bomber case. listen. that individual could walk through our typical airport back through metal detectors 10 times, a thousand times and never set off that alarm. that s the reason we have the technology here in the u.s. the body scearns as they are referred to sometimes.
that s the cover-up you re c accusing them of? i m saying that the ambassador that had nothing to do with benghazi why would you choose someone who had nothing to do with benghazi to tell us about benghazi? that s kind of odd. the president said, why pick on her? she didn t know anything about benghazi. she was the most politically compliant person they could find. i don t know what she knew, but i know the story she told was misleading. i don t know why it was misleading. but let me put this in context. would this white house mislead the american people about national security events? i think they might, simply because when the bin laden raid occurred, they leaked every detail about the raid. we have a pakistani doctor in custody because he told about the role he played. the underwear bomber case where we stopped a plot in yemen came out in the new york times. they told us about how this administration stopped the role of cyber attacks on iranian nuclear program. in three weeks
that s the cover-up you re c accusing them of? i m saying that the ambassador that had nothing to do with benghazi why would you choose someone who had nothing to do with benghazi to tell us about benghazi? that s kind of odd. the president said, why pick on her? she didn t know anything about benghazi. she was the most politically compliant person they could find. i don t know what she knew, but i know the story she told was misleading. i don t know why it was misleading. but let me put this in context. would this white house mislead the american people about national security events? i think they might, simply because when the bin laden raid occurred, they leaked every detail about the raid. we have a pakistani doctor in custody because he told about the role he played. the underwear bomber case where we stopped a plot in yemen came out in the new york times. they told us about how this administration stopped the role of cyber attacks on iranian nuclear program. in three weeks
criticizing her. you believe the president of the united states sent his ambassador to the u.n. out to mislead the american people so he could get some sort of political gain before the election? that s the cover-up you re accusing them of? i m saying that the ambassador that had nothing to do with benghazi why would you choose someone who had nothing to do with benghazi to tell us about benghazi? that s kind of odd. the president said, why pick on her? she didn t know anything about benghazi. she was the most politically compliant person they could find. i don t know what she knew, but i know the story she told was misleading. i don t know why it was misleading. but let me put this in context. would this white house mislead the american people about national security events? i think they might, simply because when the bin laden raid occurred, they leaked every detail about the raid. we have a pakistani doctor in custody because he told about the role he played. the underwear bombe