and by the way, it s the intended effect is to leave the population of the unitedat c states dangerously ignorant on questions that affect liveyou has. ave at this point, you haveorke to wonder if the average, say, new yorker is really better informed than a factory workeray in pyongyang, north korea. probably not. both have been effectively blindfolded by information monopolies. and if you doubt that s true, ask your neighbors who s winning the war in ukraine. and , i of course, to tell yl winn ukraine is winning the that s what they ve seen on the today show every morning for the past eleven months. and not just on the today show, but in virtually every media outlet in america. apart from colonel doug mcgregor s appearances on this show, for which he hasn needles to say, been condemned as an agent of putin, but he s pretty much alone. here s the version that mostm americans see this as leonskerio describe the time as the beginning of the end of the war. does we have t
has basically suppressed american speech as those americans go about debating the very policies that the government has under.s right. and if the white house did not like your position or if your position did not agree with the white house, then youth were silent and the evidence in this case right now is showinghu us that we re that s exactly what happened. government is not allowedall to censor speech, period. as you said, that is the firstas amendment to the bill of rights ,the core of the constitution right there. and this is an instance ofco government censoring speech. go is ittanc more complicated tn that or amve i missing something ? no, it s extremely i simple.t when eric schmitt and i first put the theory out and when we filed this case back in june, th were basically laughed out of the courthouse. but many b in the media and thea