Thank you, nicolle. We appreciate you. Im ari melber. We begin this broadcast with Breaking News out of the Georgia Rico Case against trump and his aides. Guilty. For the First Time Ever were reporting Tonight A Trump lawyer in the 2020 election case has now pled guilty. Sidney powell, who you may remember from presentations like that one she gave with giuliani after the election, a key coup lawyer. A key player, we should mention. Jack smiths case against trump. And most critically tonight, a rico defendant in that georgia case where she was booked for her mug shot. She was awaiting trial next week. The news tonight . She just pled guilty today, a bid to duck potentially harsher penalties in that criminal case. Unlike the federal case, today the cameras were rolling today in the georgia courtroom. You can see the defendant now convict sitting there this is where a onetime president ial lawyer became a convict. She admitted her guilt in the efforts to overturn trumps loss, and like any
Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik Neue Regierung, neuer Kurs? Stand: 28.07.2021 04:11 Uhr
Das Ende von Merkels Kanzlerinnenschaft bedeutet wohl auch außenpolitisch eine Zäsur. Doch was kommt danach? Ein Blick auf die außen- und sicherheitspolitischen Ziele der Parteien.
Eine Analyse von Kai Küstner, ARD-Hauptstadtstudio
Umgang mit Russland Die Russland-Politik dürfte das außenpolitische Kopfschmerzthema Nummer 1 für jede neue Bundesregierung bleiben. Angela Merkel verfolgte eine Druck-plus-Dialog-Doppelstrategie. Die genau so fortzuführen, dafür steht CDU-Kanzlerkandidat Armin Laschet. Genauso wenig wie die SPD wäre er je auf die Idee gekommen, die Ostseepipeline Nord-Stream 2 infrage zu stellen. Merkel sagte bei der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: Dem Molekül Gas sehen Sie doch nicht an, ob es auf dem Land- oder Seeweg transportiert wird. Insofern ist es in Ordnung, dass dieses Projekt stattfindet.
the north korea summit is grading very high. he is on a bit of a roll. the ig report, the russian investigation has hit a pothole for democrats. and now the exposure of their 514 page michael horowitz report under questioning is really exposing maybe a master plot, everything that he indicated earlier seems to be coming out. at the very least a lot of controversy. he believes that s why this immigration debate raged. do you see a connection or coincidence? i absolutely do. the timing is not coincidental. it s intentional. look, if the democratic party and the media in this country cared about this issue so much, why did they ignore it for 10 years? why did they egg four fund barack obama? why did they ignore it under bill clinton? why did they ignore it under george w. bush? when you bring this up what the media says well, wait a minute, they weren t fully enforcing the law like donald trump is fully enforcing the law. i don t even understand what that means. brian: here we are looki
are very upset about. we have a sound byte we want to play for you about how the fbi director responded. the fbi that i see is decent people committed to the highest principals of integrity and professionalism and respect. the fbi that i see is respected and appreciated. there you see he is defending the fbi, but democrats were saying no, no, you can t wait until you come up to capitol hill and say this under questioning. you can t just send a private e-mail. you have to stand up for your people when the president goes after them. democrats say and republicans say the fbi is in tatters is not objective enough. i do think the broader context is there is a lot of people particularly chuck grassley and others who seized on the text
i think brian is right. this is death by a thousand duts. remember wh goldfinger said to james bond, once is happensta e happenstance, twice coincidence, the third time is enemy action. as this drama finally begins to unfold, paul fishman and his federal grand jury have finally perked up their ears. now moments ago, brian weiss, under questioning, kevin o dowd acknowledged that governor s statement at the press conference was inconsistent. listen to this. at the point in time that the governor makes his statement, there is an e-mail that a member of his senior staff, bridget kelly is aware of that discusses the lane closures and that she received it contemporaneous with the lane closures. that s correct. does that contradict his statement? a plain read of this, it seems to be inconsistent. the governor is aware, as i testified to earlier, i handed him that document prior to that press conference.. how important is that, brian