no, not at all. this was not this was not a troubled passenger. this was not a nut job. this was not a threat to anybody. should he have been unceremoniously dragged out of this plane the way he was? he s a 69-year-old man. is that really the way we want to treat the [question inaudible] yes. they re employees of the city of chicago. the city of chicago is yeah. just because united is responsible doesn t mean the city of chicago isn t also responsible. that will all be sorted out. but it s more than one that can be responsible for a single event.
becoming asendant over the more national impulses of someone like steve bannon. and we ve seen that play out dramatically. a lot of talk about steve bannon. i ll have to leave it there. thank you so much. appreciate you all being with us. we are expecting to hear from cia director mike pompeo this hour. we ll bring you any news from him as soon as that happens. cost concerns. president trump is heading to the mar-a-lago. this. plus a dramatic press conference from the attorney for the man dragged off the united flight. what he has in store for united airlines. unceremoniously dragged out of that plane. as he 69-year-old man. even a coupe soup. [woman] so beautiful.
no, not at all. this was not this was not a troubled passenger. this was not a nut job. this was not a threat to anybody. should he have been unceremoniously dragged out of the plane the way he was? he s a 69-year-old man. is that really the way we want to treat the aged? does the city of chicago bear any responsibility? yes. they are employees of the city of chicago. the city of chicago is yeah. just because united is responsible doesn t mean the city of chicago isn t also responsible. that will all be sorted out. but more than one can be responsible for a single event. in this case, i believe that s
unceremoniously is just unfair to the legacy of a great man. rob, turning to you. this is quite a reversal. what do you think is behind it? well, i think there s a bit of drama here being created out of what is a pro forma exercise by this white house, which is to name their own u.s. attorneys. mr. bharara is high profile. he has an exemplary record. he should be congratulated and thanked for that. it s the prerogative of every president to put u.s. attorneys in each of these offices. apparently there was some agreement, according to mr. bharara, that he would stay on. i don t believe that s been an official statement from the white house or during the trump administration. rob, unique to bring him to the trump tower in a public way that he certainly didn t need to do, right? look, the presidential transition and trump tower had a lot of oddities involved in it.
like the one near miss that was masterminded by guy fawkes more than 400 years ago. it s the job of this man, black rod, to summon the house of commons to hear the queen s speech. the door slammed unceremoniously in his face to symbolize the independence of the chamber. he doesn t give up, though. and after three knocks is allowed in before the members of parliament make their way to the house of lords. the queen, balancing the priceless imperial state crown on her head, no mean feat in itself, but the real challenge for the monarch is delivering the speech in a way that gives away so little expression that you can t tell her view on any of the policies. it s her job to stay above politics. this speech may be written by her government, but she has no stay in it. and this was the headline. my government will renegotiate the united kingdom s