not be more transparent? mueller in this piece of flat out called the president a liar and says this is a smoke screen for things he s done wrong. not the case. we have more than a few hundred page mueller report, more than a year of fbi investigations. few years of mueller investigation, more than 1.4 million documents turned over. there have been unbridled, unprecedented transparency on part of the president who didn t declare executive privilege. but what we do have here are a whole lot of fact suggesting that jim comey and the upper echelons of the fbi were engaged in a lot of wrongdoing. peter strzok saying, i ve got to stop the president, have an insurance policy, the dossier whose political contents were concealed in a footnote and not aired out in the footnote for a fisa warrant. we ve got a lot of things. i m glad to hear isaac encouraging transparency, but i hope fellow democrats will as well.
happened. the guardian s reporting about paul manafort or when cnn fake news staffers were forced to resign after reporting fake news about our friend anthony scaramucci. look at the list we have compiled. fake story after fake story. now, the washington examiner put this together. 47 printed pages for one year alone against donald trump of fake news that they breathlessly report. unbridled. remember what i said at the beginning of the year hatred of the president. so many forced corrections. but then they just keep doing it again and again. how many anonymous sources hear, rumors, do you think any of this is good for the country? are they looking out for your security? , the economy, the better job for your children? a better future for our grand kids? you know what? right now one more notch in the old fake news belt. it is beyond disgusting. you just saw it all, all day, people screaming
happened. the guardian s reporting about paul manafort or when cnn fake news staffers were forced to resign after reporting fake news about our friend anthony scaramucci. look at the list we have compiled. fake story after fake story. now, the washington examiner put this together. 47 printed pages for one year alone against donald trump of fake news that they breathlessly report. unbridled. remember what i said at the beginning of the year hatred of the president. so many forced corrections. but then they just keep doing it again and again. how many anonymous sources hear, rumors, do you think any of this is good for the country? are they looking out for your security? , the economy, the better job for your children? a better future for our grand kids? you know what? right now one more notch in the old fake news belt. it is beyond disgusting. you just saw it all, all
he was named in a federal courthouse by a defendant as illegally instructing him to commit a felony. a felony that was kind of crucial to his own election. yes. right? i mean, he has committed crimes. he has obstructed justice. he has ordered the justice department to investigate his enemies. i mean, he kind of tweets something every other day that in and of itself would be an impeachable offense in a healthy society. there s a legitimate, i think, political debate about whether we should wait for the mueller investigation. but i don t think there s a legitimate debate about democrats about whether he has done things that plausibly merit impeachment. one thing that was interesting about this episode, and yesterday being on capitol hill is watching it was a generational divide around how democrats think about their role in the public sphere and who they re talking to, a little bit, and worries about being a defensive crowd. there s an interesting generational thing happening w
courthouse by a defendant as illegally instructing him to commit a felony. a felony that was kind of crucial to his own election. yes. right? i mean, he has committed crimes. he has obstructed justice. he has ordered the justice department to investigate his enemies. i mean, he kind of tweets something every other day that in and of itself would be an impeachable offense in a healthy society. there s a legitimate, i think, political debate about whether we should wait for the mueller investigation. but i don t think there s a legitimate debate about democrats about whether he has done things that plausibly merit impeachment. one thing that was interesting about this episode, and yesterday being on capitol hill is watching it was a generational divide around how democrats think about their role in the public sphere and who they re talking to, a little bit, and worries about being a defensive crowd. there s an interesting generational thing happening with new and younger members