inquiry. i have been calling for one after seeing the weak response of recent months is not working against the president who believes in total obstruction. no documents, no talking, no nothing. and given that reality it s time to move forward. forcefully and through impeachment inquiry as soon as possible. that will only happen if more people demand it of the congress. you may lose the lawsuit. the statute is written unbelievably plainly. i m with you. there s confusion about why you have the treasury secretary. that is your best fact is the treasury secretary is front running this. it s supposed to be the irs commissioner and he works for the treasury secretary. the treasury isn t mentioned in the statute. that would allow the case this being blocked. couldn t you see the judge saying you don t need the taxes. they can tell you whether they have been auditing him.
haven t so many of you said enough already to justify an impeachment inquiry. if you feel like chasing these things down, do it the right way or don t do it at all. absolutely. we should begin an impeachment inquiry. i ve been calling for one after seeing that the weak, timid response of recent months is not working against a president who believes in total obstruction, no documents, no talking, no nothing, and given that reality, it s time to move forward forcefully and do it through an impeachment inquiry as soon as possible. i think that will only happen if more people across this country demand it of the congress. by the way, i think you may lose the lawsuit. yes, the statute is written unbelievably plainly. i m with you. there s a little bit of confusion why you have the treasury secretary your best fact is that the treasury secretary is front running this because it s supposed to be the irs commissioner.