but is it expected to pass? hi the very latest from capitol hill, all thingswashin hitchhiker s guide to washington, d.c. in the swamc., inp cad program is t us . chad, what s going o on ? we expect this to pass, don t we? yeah, sean , good evening.go in fact, we think that they re going to start this 3 mn vote here in the next two tout three minutes. they started this debate at seven , 17 eastern time. and we think thi the actuankl rl call vote is going to come any. minute here. so it s pending. dwe do o expect a bipartisanrs to vote coalition of democrats and gop . house speaker kevin mccarthy members to vote yes. house speaker kevin mccarthy made the closing argumen tt. he said don t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. i could say i m going to vote no because there s something re summnot in the bill. if i took that philosophy, i would never vote yes . i simply read the bills in front of me and decide, is this good for the country? i would say that answerhat an is
the negotiations and all of the you need to know and look, i sympathize with many of the freedom caucus members and the others, the fifty seven or so republicansre who want more . lot more .for what look at this is a step in a the right direction from what has been a completely fine fina financially irresponsible, unaccountable federal government, particularlyeo-govee the altar of covid that s been going on for over three years now. look, we ve done this together for years. you got sixty eight republicans went against this s a bill .r or that s a large number.y talk now, whether or not there was early talk when the bill first came out and the deal was announced, there is talk aboutea a motion to vacate. any one republican member could could start that against kevin mccarthy because that s something he should worry about. well, not right now. it passed, but i thinkfter he s always worried about that. i think that the passing might say, why don t you negotiate a harder bill ? they
be back next year and next year and next year. because i believe government should be here to help you not go after you . we didn t just take the money from this year. we took another 20 billion. i think we should get some more border agents with that. twenty billion . i think that s where america would want to see us go. we cap the ability of growth of spending in government for the next six years. we re holding people accountable to do the work you re supposed to do as a member. otherwise it cuts across the board. we are unshackling what holds america back for competition with other countries. for the first time in 40 years, we changed the environmental review process. so you don t have to wait seven years on average to build a road. you could do it in one or two . so it s not just the bridges,
a funny way to what everything that that man has done since he took the oath of office has been purposeful, suffering and hardship on the american people. and she, janet yellen, can go out and sell the gold reserves. that s more than half a trillion dollars that would pay our bills in the united states for four months because we re running a one and a half trillion dollar budget deficit right now. so there are a lot of things that she could do that the people in charge of government could do to prioritize payments. but would they do it? no, because they re spiteful and they don t care about suffering and hardship and financial catastrophe. and calamity on the american people. and i think that kevin mccarthy showed that republicans with even the slimness of majorities, are capable of governing. and if you want more power and you want more cuts, you want to write this country
committee does. that s what this committee was created to do. wewe have oversight overn th the federal government. but for some reason, the fbi thinks they re immune to oversight. look, the durham reporlike thete that the fbi has lots of issues. we brought that up, senator grassley. and i reminded director wray that the durham report wasthe f. devastating to the credibility of the fbi and his response was that that all happened befoream he became fbi director . fbi so, look, all we want is this for and it s not classified.eda they can redact the name ofe the informant. i m fine with it. i would have i redactet if i hdf i had the document. you know, without that the red redaction. let s protecuctiont the human informant. i agree with that. we shoult.d always want to be very clear . you believe in the credibility of this this whistleblower. you believe that the allegation that joe bidention tha as vice president received money for rhis family or family enterprie in exchange for a speci