Six soldiers were injured by a vehicle and calling the attack deliberate. Chewing through the sea of red in japan. The nikkei 1. 3 as investors piled into the safe haven over 1 in south korea as well. On trade to the entertainment giant announced it will go headtohead with netflix starting its own entertainment dreaming surveys. Fbn am starts right now. Churning 35 01 a. M. In new york. When day, august 9th. And lauren simonetti. Cheryl good morning, everybody. Im cheryl personae. Cheryl casone. We are following all of the rattling which has reached ahead. President trump in north korea treating such drugs of fire hours apart. North korea seriously considering a plan to launch a missile strike on a u. S. Territory of guam. That is on two nuclearcapable bombers at Andersen Air Force base. The governor guam says the island is prepared for any eventuality. Lauren more and President Trumps comments and reactions to them from adam shapiro. Reporter good morning, cheryl, good morning, lauren
Steve aveson is off tonight after calling for national unity, the president went on twitter to attacked what he called the Fake News Media and blamed them for pressuring him to condemn rightwing hate groups. Natthe police were bringing flamethrowers to burn us. White supremacists gathered outside the courthouse where james fields appeared by video from jail. He said he had been working as a Security Guard for 13 hundred dollars a month and couldnt afford a lawyer. The judge denied him bail on Second Degree murder charges,natpolice say fields drove his Dodge Challenger into a crowd protesting the neo nazi rally on saturday, injuring 20 e people and killing heather heyer,it was important for her to speak up for people she thought werent being heard. To speak up when injustices were happening. Fields was described as an avid fan of nazi germany by his high school teacher. His mother says she had no idea of his extreme racial views. Altright, what is it . i thought it had something to do w
And the military intervention is following the logic of what you might imagine. It is designed to change the balance of power. So all of this suggests that when you look at what they are actually doing it is unfortunate that the day he was in moscow was the day we had the stories that she was quoting from the un officials responsible for providing humanitarian assistance. The russians are carrying out a set of attacks not just going after the non isys opposition the trying to depopulate areas, deliberately making it harder for humanitarian assistance, attacking hospitals, attacking grain silos, attacking Water Treatment plants, and all of this again is part of a fundamental approach designed to produce an interesting reality. They want ironically a posture that is similar to what a sod wants and what isys wants as well, polarization. They wanted to mobilize. A sod wants it to mobilize the world. And it is clear that is what i think putin wants. Wants. Maybe he can change of the costs g
Of course we have these capabilities, but the most important answer to the question why us is even more fundamental. It is this. We should not be content standing aside. We have a fundamental question. Act now with our friend has been struck in this way, then the allies of the world can be forgiven for asking, if not now, when. That leads to the next question, why now. Wasfirst answer to that because of the grave danger that they pose to our security. There are additional reasons why action now is so important. Paris,t the attack in theres a real political process underway. This could lead to a new government in syria with whom we can defeat for good. We cannot wait for that to be complete before we begin acting to grant isil. Lets be clear about the military objectives that we are pursuing. Yes we wanted to take a terrorists by canceling their network committed targeting their training camps, and taking of those policy against the u. K. , but there is a broader objective. Peddlelong a
So we need to do the same thing in syria. Mr. Speaker, another reason for action now is that success in iraq in squeezing the caliphate is put at risk by our failure to act in syria. This border is not recognized by isil and we tamper our efforts if we stop acting when we reach the border. When we come to the question, why now, we have to ask ourselves whether the risks of inaction are greater than the risks of taking action . Every day we failed to act is a day when isil can grow stronger and more plots can be undertaken. Mr. Speaker, that is why their all says yes,ved that the risks of inaction are someto some of our asking specifically whether taking action can make the u. K. More of a target for iso. The judgment of the direct general of Security Service in the chairman of the joint Intelligence Committee is that the u. K. Is already in the top tier of countries that isil is targeting. I am clear that the only way to deal with that reality is to address the threat we face, and do s