Risk insurance is not a Silver Bullet that will solve these problems. Investors are interested in ukraine, but they will enter when the situation stabilizes, and of course, they carefully monitor changes in the environment for business, institutions. A big positive was the approval of the new law on the management of state enterprises. This is a step in the right direction. The imf recently improved its gdp forecast for russia. Do sanctions work . Event . The russian economy has been under sanctions since 2014, so i think those who expected western sanctions to cause an economic or financial crisis in russia had unrealistic expectations, sanctions are working but slowly, they are depriving russia of knowledge that is contained in capital goods , which russia cannot import knowledge acquired by international corporations. Such corporations would normally be there. But they left the russian market. We will see the impact of sanctions, but in the medium term in the form of performance slo
Nt have, im not saying that he shouldnt have, i m saying i dont know why he didnt do it, maybe he will do it again, but regarding those the law, must, must, tell me, should i, actually, i cant answer what i should do, what i shouldnt do, wait, you are a member of the Verkhovna Rada, how are you not supposed to answer, the powers of the president are clearly provided for in the constitution of ukraine, i did not see such a thing in the provisions of the constitution duty, how to report on the laws signed by him, therefore you know, speaking from the point of view of moral and ethical should or should not. I dont want to, and from a legal point of view he definitely shouldnt have done this, but regarding the laws you are talking about, we can say here that he should have done this and reported on this, because these laws concern of the european euroatlantic integration of ukraine, this is the fulfillment of the requirements and recommendations of the council of europe, and of course he,
All separate bills and aid to israel, and ukraine, and aid to the countries of the Pacific Ocean region, if it is an omnibus, well , as far as i understand the procedure, it will certainly facilitate the task for the senate, if not, then the process of agreements, votes and so on will begin again, plus it was absolutely correct. It is said that the last day, friday it is no longer working in the house of representatives, but of course it can work, at least johnson promised a vote on friday, next week for both houses it is closed, and work resumes only on april 29, that is, again it is postponed and. Again, well, at least now it is more or less clear that there are high chances that there will be a vote, and we hope that it will be effective, because the votes really seem to be there, but due to the time factor, he continues, continues to act and act not in favor of ukraine. I do i understand, if i understood correctly, then the positive scenario is that if the draft law. Congress votes
Authorities deliver on their ommitment, which we have every reason to believe they will. Gentleman in the middle . Chris giles from the financial times. Madam, the i. M. F. Regularly gives other countries advice and cause for a plan b, most recently asking the e. B. Foment give effort on things. Is it time now for a plan b. For the i. M. F. Where you circumvent the u. S. . You know, i dont think our institution should move to plan until we have full certainty that plan a is definitely dead. Im not prepared to declare that that the point. And i very strongly hope that he results of the institution, the pressure brought to bear by the members of this institution on all those who have not yet ratifying will deliver fruit in the not too distant future. Ok. Going to say stay in the middle. Lady in the white jacket. Thank you. My question is about japan. Your projection with lower with 0. 3. And do you still believe in economics . If so, why . Especially third al lowe since not working well,
We also know that she a a broken federal law by disclosing sensitive tax return information. We know she was heavily involved in the orchestration and disclosure of the information to the public about inappropriate tactics used by the irs. She wanted to avoid litigation that dean disclosure form because as she put it if it goes to litigation all details are public. I guess he needed. It seemed as though ms. Lerner wish to stay away from litigation to avoid having all details of the issues from the incoming public. These facts lead to one assume that this could be the same motive she used when withholding information from congress. We also know she relied on this committee on numerous accounts. We asked her whether the criteria for evaluating taxexempt applications had changed at any point. Ms. Lerner responded the criteria have not change but it had. In 2012 she told this committee that the information the irs was requesting in letters to conservative taxexempt applicants was not out o