today. the democrats are trying to impeach the president of the united states based on anonymous whistleblower 13 months before an election, anonymous whistleblower with no firsthand knowledge and has a bias against the president. of course the white house is fed up with this. sandra: ranking house member jim jordan a short time ago on this program on the ukraine whistleblower controversy. let s bring in our a-team brad blakeman, james freeman, assistant editor of the wall street journal and leslie marshall progressive radio show host. james and leslie are also fox news contributors. brad, kick things off for us. where do things stand as we see both sides digging in their heels here? this is not impeachment. it s an inquisition of the president. non-stop investigation starting the day he got elected and
devices connected to your homes wifi are protected. which helps keep people outside from accessing your passwords, credit cards and cameras. and people inside from accidentally visiting sites that aren t secure. and if someone trys we ll let you know. xfi advanced security. if it s connected, it s protected. call, click, or visit a store today. harris: new reaction from top republicans on the ukraine
think i m having a fair hearing or getting a full hearing from inspector general, there is no suggestion that i know of. at a minimum, why not go to the senate intelligence committee, which has a far different reputation? in terms of fair rent dominic fair mindedness reasonableness. harris: i m wondering if people know that or if you don t just go wherever you go. excuse me for interrupting. whistle-blowers for the process. they know, you know as a federal employee we right side. you are advised of those rights, and you can read about those rights. this is not hidden. this is absolutely clear, that there is a very specific process that you go through that will protect you, but also to help ensure honest government. harris: ken starr, thank you for your time and expertise today. more developments in the ukraine whistleblower controversy, as the intelligence community s watchdog is testifying right behind closed doors.
closed testimony very soon. have you reached an agreement with the whistleblower and his or her attorneys providing the information first-hand? yes, we have. and as director magire promised during the hearing, that whistleblower will be allowed to come in and come in without a minder from the justice department or from the white house. democrats have laid out a timeline of testimony from some of the major players in the ukraine whistleblower controversy. here you see it. five senior state department officials are scheduled to give depositions before the house in the next two weeks. there is no republican support as of yet for impeachment to date. the president s personal attorney, though, rudy giuliani was telegraphing an unwillingness from republicans to work with democrats. i wouldn t cooperate with adam schiff. i think adam schiff should be removed.
brennan, and chris murphy of connecticut who met with ukraine s leader recently, now is calling for impeachment inquiry himself. good day, everyone, i m andrea mitchell in new york where the president s highly partisan speech to the u.n. was upstaged by impeachment moves by democrats from capitol hill, mostly nancy pelosi s top lieutenants in the democratic caucus, saying there needs to be an impeachment inquiry now to get to the bottom of the ukraine whistleblower controversy. house speaker nancy pelosi may be preparing for the inevitable. the entire democratic caucus meeting today. key holdouts on impeachment say they ve changed their minds because of the administration s refusal to turn over that whistleblower report. i m just going to be very frank tonight.