As a whole and hamas, who had carried out murderous attacks on ordinary israeli families and young people at a music festival. One viewer who wrote in to newswatch wished to put a complaint in about the news channel at 11 25 am saying, the protesters in london were hamas supporters. That was a disgrace. They were showing support for the palestinian people. Maggie gardiner said, this is not only factually incorrect, it is extremely offensive and dangerous and disrespects all the protesters who were there to call for peace. Apologise and do better. And the bbc did. On monday afternoon, the Bbc News Channel issued this apology for the mistake. Now, before we go, earlier on bbc news, we reported on some of the pro palestinian demonstrations at the weekend. We spoke about several demonstrations across britain during which people voiced their backing for hamas. We accept that this was poorly phrased and was a misleading description of the pro palestinian demonstrations. On tuesday, there was
Did the West intentionally incite Putin to war?
sott.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sott.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
these weapons. and i wanted to get details on that. he was saying it s difficult to provide those details when the battlefield is always changing, and the president said this was rather temporary to hold ukraine over. what are the details of that? how long will these munitions be provided? those are answers i think we will need to continue to press. a lot of those questions stemming from what we heard from officials, 500 days ago, or so, when this war started, the us ambassador to the un very clearly saying, there is not a place for these weapons on that battlefield. so that is why. that s why we heard from democratic lawmakers yesterday who were saying we can t claim to have the moral high ground if this is the path we are following. i found interesting both jake sullivan and the president yesterday in this interview really went to great lengths to show how they believe the way that russia and ukraine use these weapons and weapons themselves are actually
will: a cover-up for what? the exile to belarus and the fact that he feels, i guess, some level of confidence that he can remain alive after standing up to putin is an interesting note. it does lead to more questions. so what, what are you suggesting when you say cover-up? well, it could be cover-up for some military moves that russia could be doing, you know? it could be cover-up to make some changes in the power and also maybe, you know, he is going to be the country very close to russia, ukraine and nato and he s going to be still this control of very brutal fighters that are are real criminals. and they, you know, he has big forces in africa and no one knows what he s going to be doing this and never was told what his fighters in russia are going to be. but ultimately, there is a rift between in this criminal group and this fight for power because when they came and tried to take ukraine over, they thought it was going to be easy, but it