In Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts, Inc. and NaviStone, Inc. the Third Circuit determined that an interception indeed occurred under WESCA, but could not determine where – a critical question since WESCA does not apply to conduct outside of Pennsylvania.
In Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts, the Third Circuit held NaviStone’s collection of Popa’s information violated Pennsylvania’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act. The ruling emphasizes obtaining consent from website visitors before collecting data.
In Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts, the plaintiff visited the retailer’s website which contained code that sent an HTTP GET request to third party marketer NaviStone. The Third Circuit held the application of Pennsylvania’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.
Vadim Ghirda & Andreea Alexandru RESCA, ROMANIA (AP) – The clatter of shields and battle cries filled the misty air as warriors lifted their swords. Nearby, gladiators fought each other for their lives. A festival that featured historic re-enactments brought the ancient Roman era back to life this month near a sleepy village in southern […]