were going to do there, what was the purpose and what were the schedules, and what was the volume of so-called investment into biological activity into ukraine. the material, data, everything, please put this on the table. in the start of the ukrainian bio labs received documents on the 24th of february to remove the vestiges of cholera and other diseases that were being stored there. all of that has got documents to confirm this. but moreover, we were have been talking about this over a number of years in the past. and the statements of the foreign ministry and statements of other russian bodies.
invasion, and evasion they knew was coming and they helped encourage. if you would ve told us that four days ago, we would have dismissed you as a knot. it was just too preposterous. there was no way it could be true. it s too far out. and in any case coming out he knew for a fact that that story was false. how do we know that? because we read usa today. within hours of the russian evasion, usa today published a rebuttal to all those crazies yammering on about secret ukrainian bio labs. here was the headline. fact-check: u.s. bio labs in ukraine tied to russian disinformation campaign. if you look carefully at the story, and we did, notice that this fact-check was sourced to ukrainian government unnamed officials and then bide and state department officials. these were not exactly objectives sources on the subject, but still, it seemed definitive. it was totally emphatic. russia has teamed up with china to further amplify the false
state has said under oath there are bio labs in ukraine. in the contents of those labs, because it s a war zone, they haven t been secured, could wind up in the wrong hands, to which tulsi gabbard said holy smokes, this is a big deal. i served in the u.s. army, we don t know that. we know the bio labs can sometimes called, because massive problems for the world. i think we ve just seen that. that was tulsi gabbard s point. the new york times was quick to denounce us for even talking about the subject. oh, don t call them bio weapons. we never alleged the united states was making bio weapons, we don t know that. what we said it s was is what s factually true, which is there are stores we learned this from a u.s. government of soviet era bio weapons in ukraine that for some reason have not yet been destroyed. that s a huge problem potentially. in the new york times admitted that in their attack of us. mr. pope, who runs the program, had warned that russia s invasion of ukraine
tonight a conspiracy theory that sounds a lot like pro-russian propaganda, about by all apps in ukraine being fundamentally new units funded by the united states. now, would if these bio labs are handling very dangerous pathogens that may lead to the deaths in people in the areas? there are reports of possibly deadly pathogens escaping these bio labs in places like ukraine, georgia, stan, that is responsible for killing people. would it that is true? i think these are questions that we should ask, because no american citizen wants to be held morally and ethically responsible, and the u.s. government should not be finding something that is killing people in a country that is not even our own, little known here at home. there s a lot to debunk there. i just want to be clear. there s no evidence that these pathogens are leaking and killing people or that the bio labs are working on biological
soaring gas prices? emily jesse, what do you think about us sending stephen colbert the bill since he doesn t mind paying 15 bucks a gallon. thank you for watching. tucker carlson is up next. spiel good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. if you had told us just four days ago that the biden administration was funding secret bio labs and ukraine of all places, we would not have believed you. i don t think we would put that on tv, no thanks. it then if you told us that on only did the administration fund the secret bio labs in ukraine, but that they then failed to secure the deadly contents of those labs before the russian