Thereof or by force to prevent, hinder or delay the execution any law of the united states or by force to seize, take or possess any property of the united states, contrary to the authority thereof they shall fined under this title or prison of 20 years or both. mr. prosecutor, i notice this isn t in your bill of particulars, why is that? why is it that the media is not saying? he wasn t charged with a slam dunk charge, why? because he didn t commit that act. remember this one? 18 u.s. code section 2383. rebellion or insurrection, isn t january 6th insurrection day? whoever incites, sets on foot, assists or engage in any rebellion or insurrection, laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort there to shall be fined in prison of ten years or both, in
The minute that i cooperated with them. the mitigating factor is that i cooperated with the government. when dennis toner and i spoke and he said he didn t know what i was talking about, the next day that unsealed the indictment, wouldn t let me talk to the bidens and would not now it certainly makes sense what i was suspecting back then. certainly makes sense now. martha: what do you mean by that? well, they were protecting the bidens then, they re protecting them now and i think the evidence is overwhelming that when attorney general merrick garland said that he treats like cases alike, that s really what upset me. i can tell you no, sir, you do not. you do not treat like cases alike. that s why i filed my intent to file a brief called an amicus brief to help the court understand because she s required under statute 18 u.s. code section 355-3 a-6, she s
Lawyers. that would be who he s trying to build a case on. some of these people who were involved in this game, you saw that email a moment go very problematic. jenna alice, others were involved in that fake electors scheme. they would be the next targets. so while he s working on a bottom-up scheme, we know that he s working from the top down as well with pence. but this, i think, is a an important development. in terms of the concrete evidence here again, i m not a lawyer. it does seem if you sign the document, that is fraudulent, and that attempt to use it to get someone elected president, and submitted to the national archives, you are engaged in fraud. so if you conspire with people to have them do that the u.s. code has a conspiracy to defraud the u.s.. if two or more persons conspire, either to commit the offense against the u.s. or defraud the u.s. or any agency thereof in any matter for any purpose, that does seem like a pretty
There are two parts of this, right? jack smith spoke briefly, but he did talk about not just his desire for a speedy trial but the defendant s right to a speedy trial. on the other hand, what glenn is reporting on and has reported on, is trump fairly successfully using legal delays to his benefit. tell me where the rubber meet. s the road there. well, the scheduling order that the that became public this morning that the judge had signed is a pretty standard scheduling order, because by vir chow of the speedy trial act, which is part of our u.s. code, separate from the speedy trial that s in the constitution, the code says, you know, in the ordinary case you ll be tried within 70 days of your indictment, right. so the judge was kind of looking at the calendar and picking the date that would get within that. there are all kinds of exceptions to that speedy trial act, where the judge can grant exceptions or continuances. the judge in her order
It s not just should. it s must. 28 u.s. code section 485 says that a federal judge must recuse him or herself in any case where that judges impartiality might reasonably be questioned. no person could look at the situation and fail at least to say that that standard is met. and if she doesn t recuse herself, then the 11th circuit, threw a writ of mandate muss and director to do so, which is very rare. if this is indeed a very rare case. it s a remarkable thing is that donald trump s lawyers argued that judge merchan, who is set to conduct the trial we, brought, pursuant to the alvin bragg indictment in manhattan, that he is someone that must recuse himself.