a box cutter forced an emergency landing on a frontier flight from cincinnati. should the traveling public be worried? absolutely not. metal objects are certainly a concern. however, explosives remain the number-one concern. reporter: keith jeffries, former federal security director at l.a.x., says t.s.a. will certainly review their procedures, but diligent and aware passengers have become an important line of defense. passengers will not tolerate that, and they will intervene and do what they can necessary to keep the public safe. reporter: now, t.s.a. says disposable razors are allowed on flights, but razor blades are not. officials say they re concerned about these incidents and they will continue to work to deploy new x-ray technology that better detects these small items. jericka. duncan: christina ruffini, thank you. cbs has obtained the autopsy and the police report in the death of shanquella robinson. she s the american woman who was found dead last month during a
Diagnostic Imaging Market is segmented By Type (X-Ray, (By Portability (Mobile, Stationary), By Technology (Analog Imaging, Digital Imaging)), MRI (By.
what are the medical consequences of this law? yes, stephanie, the medical consequences of this law, and the repercussions in the states around arizona are incredible. just be clear, and near total ban is essentially a total ban, because the exception they makers for the life of the mother, but when you look and i m unpack what is passed in 1864, enacted in 1901, just five years after we haven t had x-ray technology, you see that if i was a physician wanted to transfer somebody to an abortion provider, because they had an ectopic pregnancy, or any number of conditions that would require that level of special skill, i would face criminal penalties and put into jail. so you re putting the criminal system, and the justice system and between the patients and and their health care team. what does that mean for patients privacy? yeah, so this is an area a
consequences of this law, and the repercussions in the states around arizona are incredible. just be clear, and near total ban is essentially a total ban, because the exception they makers for the life of the mother, but when you look and i m unpack what is passed in 1864, enacted in 1901, just five years after we haven t had x-ray technology, you see that if i was a physician wanted to transfer somebody to an abortion provider, because they had an ectopic pregnancy, or any number of conditions that would require that level of special skill, i would face criminal penalties and put into jail. so you re putting the criminal system, and the justice system and between the patients and and their health care team. what does that mean for patients privacy? yeah, so this is an area a situation where we have protections. 13 states in the united states, where we have at least have protections for reproductive services. all the other states, including