people in the meeting the latest reporting showing six, might have been seven, each person suffering from all the russo the amnesia wit a second no there was one else np no there was someone else. there was at translateser this person. i mean, it is incredible to me that donald trump jr. thinks that the worst thing about this meeting is that nothing came out of it. it s not that he actually accepted the meeting and said, oh, my goodness, i got an e-mail in which somebody said that the russian government is trying to help my father win the election. help. i m here to report a crime. instead of saying that, he said, i love it, and went ahead with the meeting. and what he thinks is bad is that nothing came out of it. i mean, really, we have to ask ourselves that question. you re so right. that line, nothing came of it, has been the response of the president all through the surrogates and we have no proof of that yet. we don t know that to be true or
transparency. let s be honest there is no way at a donald trump jr. would have released the e-mails had the new york times not been on the phone with him saying we ve got your emails and we re about to release them. that s the only reason he put them out there in order to try to get ahead of the story which was going to be out there anyway. in answer to the question token which is is there more come? absolutely there is more coming. everyone talks about is there another shoe to drop. there are more shoes in than in immelinda marko s closet. we re talking about how many people in the meeting the latest reporting showing six, might have been seven, each person suffering from all the russo the amnesia wit a second no there was one else np no there was someone else. there was at translateser this person. i means it incredible to me that donald trump jr. things the worst thing about that meeting was that nothing came out of it. it s not that eactually accepted the meeting i understand ins
transparency. let s be honest there is no way at a donald trump jr. would have released the e-mails had the new york times not been on the phone with him saying we ve got your emails and we re about to release them. that s the only reason he put them out there in order to try to get ahead of the story which was going to be out there anyway. in answer to the question token which is is there more come? absolutely there is more coming. everyone talks about is there another shoe to drop. there are more shoes in than in immelinda marko s closet. we re talking about how many people in the meeting the latest reporting showing six, might have been seven, each person suffering from all the russo the amnesia wit a second no there was one else np no there was someone else. there was at translateser this person. i means it incredible to me that donald trump jr. things the worst thing about that meeting was that nothing came out of it. it s not that eactually accepted
that s important not just for what possible effect it could have had, intelligence officials are alls telling me russia is certain to attack future u.s. elections. okay, we have them coming up, 2018th, 20 when the. that s important. let s talk about the hacker, now, the leaker, i should say a. contractor working for the nsa, 25 years old, apparently accessed this classified do you mean, printed it out and shared wit a journalist. they shared wit another contractor to ask if it was a valid document and then that contractor shared it with his or her bosses to let them know that this was out there and then when they did an investigation, they were able trace it back to this leaker in part based on a very simple fact t. image of the document had a crease in it, which seemed to show it had been printed out. they looked at how many people had printed out this document. it wasn t very many. through some good defective work we were able to trace it back to this leaker, who now faces serious ch
then decides he is going to tell the press. then he is going to the tell president and he is going to tell the press again that whole sequence, beginning with paul ryan as the first stop, what do you read in that? what that says to me is that this wasn t about furthering the committee s investigation. it was about furthering the committee s investigation, he would have brought that information back to the committee, briefed all the committee members about it, shared wit a ranking member, asked for follow-up information from the white house. it s one thing to go to the speaker of the house to have the conversation to seek some guidance. but then to go from there to the press, from the press to the white house, back out to the public, i mean, that whole sequence of events i ve never seen anything like it. and ned price, what s your reading of whether the chairman crossed the legal line here? well, lawrence, as you played, he certainly referred to the existence of fisa warrants. any