servers at the justice department, career lawyers who are already worried about the o there is an idea here, a silver lining that she s short lived. he doesn t seem like someone who could be confirmed by the senate. no. that doesn t mean he can t do a lot of damage to the mueller investigation in that short period of time. that s the question, natasha. again, this looks to all the world like a loyalist who only has his job because he s a loyalist, whose paper trail on twitter and elsewhere is a mile long about talking about squeezing the mueller investigation, about it being a witch hunt if it crosses over into finances. what happens now? what does your reporting say it triggers in terms of what happens with rosenstein and mueller and the investigation? well, whitaker is now mueller s boss, right, so he oversees the entirety of the mueller investigation at this point. so if mueller went to him and said, hey, i want to indict this person or said, hey, i need more
it s important to underline the fact that he has been seen by the west wing as the eyes and ears of the justice department. that speaks volumes, this is someone who made his way in his career based entirely on his political connections. he was not even an assistant u.s. attorney before he was appointed u.s. attorney for the southern district of iowa by george w. bush in 2004. entirely because of political connections. he s known as a mover and a shaker and people in the justice department say that he now has managed to ingratiate himself into the trump white house where it doesn t matter if he has the experience necessary. he is uniquely now positioned in a way that trump has wanted this loyalist in the justice department. now he s the one that s ready to serve that up. let me show, there s a law professor, julia, i think from iowa who posted this on twitter,
and so no matter what he tries to do to say to mueller, sorry, you re out, and he might well do that, and people will rise up about it, all of that work is going to come forward. it is going to come forward because the republicans did something. when they were in charge of it they said it doesn t take bipartisanship to issue a subpoena. yup. so the democrats can do it without the republicans. and guess what? the materials will come forward. the truth will out. it will. do you think the politics of the house, when it does take control, how do you think the politics of that play out as that fight obviously is going to escalate very quickly? well, look, what trump has to be thinking about, and republicans that remain in the house have to be thinking about is 2020. in 1974, we had a blowout, a 49 republicans in the house and eight in the senate, because they were assumed to be or believed to be part of the corrupt scheme of president nixon. these guys recognize right now they got b
a decision it might even take another year if i were to then be deported i will have lived in sweden for four years i really don t know how i would react to that the nurse in case has fueled debate on asylum and immigration in sweden parliamentary elections are coming up in september and surveys show increasing support for right wing populists but there are also those who welcome refugees. simply stop the night is government should put a stop to immigration. and everybody will need immigration in sweden because we need the workers i will certainly not vote for any party that is against refugees and immigration and. the biggest opposition party the conservative moderate is outraged over the acclaim arison has received for her activism. follett s who doesn t here in sweden it s not the government that decides on deportation. it s about it s the courts does. it and it s not
the cabinet in the senior staff, who is doing a bad job, who he gets along with and ho doesn t. one official said think of it as a thinning out of the inner circle and he is going to try to rely on people who he feels like get him and understand him. and so that s why you re seeing a move like replacing rex tillerson with mike pompeo at the state department, someone the president has a real comfort level with. you know will, just thinking back to our best presidents that succeeded politically. roosevelt had harry hopkins. reagan had jim baker. they relied on certain people. they relied on certain people all the time. they needed a con sill aere. you don t know what this is going to lead to, mr. president or the consequence you haven t considered. you need somebody to second-guess you, not challenge you all the time but be a bigger brain for you. does trump think his brain is enough to answer all the big