as welg. a couple things. there were allegations by one of the campaigns, the trump campaign, that the process was rigged. the allegation wasn t that it was being rigged by a foreign power. why wasn t it more important to tell the american people the length and breadth of what the russians were doing to interfere in an election than any risk that it might be seen as putting your hand on the scale? didn t the public have a compelling need to know, notwithstanding the claims made by a campaign about a different kind of rigging? and the need to rebut the idea that this was being presented to the public deliberately to influence the outcome. yes, yes and yes. which is why we did tell the american public everybody we were in a position to tell them on that date. you will note from my statement that we attributed the hacking directly to the russian government. we were not then in a position
do you believe we re actively at war? welg, i m not certain what the semantics mean. we re fighting a fight overseas and fighting here in the u.s. and these people want to come here and kill us. we talk about al qaeda. we talk about isis. we talk about boko haram. a lot of these are just distinctions without a difference. it s important to remember this is radical islamists who want to come here and kill us. that s their mission in life. in the book though, you have chilling stories of 16 foiled terror plots against this city. yep. there were 16 plots and some of them were the result of great work on the part of the fbi. great work on the part of the nypd and sheer luck. for instance, fashul assad wasn t on anybody s radar screen or didn t know anything about him until he tried that blow
these two handguns. no background check would have changed that. but does it make you think? do we do all that we can do to control who gets a weapon? do you think we do enough? welg, i think it doesn t more gun control laws are not going to solve this problem. gld how about better enforcement of the current ones. the enforcement of the current laws, the sharing of information, the meticulousness with which the current laws are dealt with. do you think we re good enough on that? we don t have any evidence that this wasn t good enough. you can t predict whether a person is going to use a knife or a gun or some other kind of instrumentality? we have a report from two days ago of a young man in oklahoma who killed his father in a coffee shop with a knife. so that s not the issue.
bring us flooding. the projection was 45.8 so we are glad it has come down a little bit and we certainly don t want the citizens to feel like it s lessoned the blow from the flood, so the other thing i want the citizens know is don t be preoccupied with any of the water bills, suer bills garbage, and we are suspending that and we want to make sure they don t have to worry about that at this time and we will be getting with them on that. i think things are welg in hand but having been born and raised here all my life the river is very unpredictable. we have to make sure that we stay fluid and as things change we react to them. so anyhow i want to thank the
suspect is still on the loose. this is the one going on in pennsylvania. it started with a series of shootings. tonight, the man hunt in this case was extended from month gom ri county into bucks county, pennsylvania. authorities say they are searching for this man, 35-year-old bradly stone. he s from pensburg, pennsylvania. he s suspected in three shootings in three different locations today. shootings that left his ex-wife dead as welg as five other people. so six all together. the district attorney says the suspected should be considered armed and dangerous. as representatives of pensburg, where the man lives, to remain inside their homes and keep their dog e doors locked. but, again, one of the very alarming things about this is that this is an unresolve situation at this point. it seems to be rooted in a domestic conflict. but the man suspected of killing