yesterday, he wouldn t answer questions, saying an internal investigation is under way into all the parties that have come to light. the labour leader, isolating because of covid, tweeted today. it s not just the labour party that are angry about this, there are plenty of my parliamentary colleagues who have no idea - what anyone in that e mail chain was thinking, or how. - this is utterly indefensible, it cannot be defended. i they weren t saying it publicly. what should the prime minister do with these latest revelations, sir? ..but arriving in parliament today, tory mps, some angry, some aghast, and a new opening for labour. i apologise again, unreservedly, for the upset that these allegations have caused. the prime minister has asked for an investigation. there s no need for an investigation into the simple central question today, did the prime minister attend the event in the downing street
capitalism, invisible hand but you always had to watch out for the unbridled power of monopolies. that s what we re doing here. and what i consider a reasonable way. well, we wanted to follow this and it is a big deal as a bipartisan piece of legislation that we re following through congress. i want to talk about a couple of other issues. and that is the president s news conference yesterday, a couple of clean-ups and clarifications today and a big one about ukraine and russia. you just returned from ukraine on a caudill, a trip with lawmakers. this is what the ukrainian president tweeted today. we at this point in time remind the great powers that there are no minor incursions and small nations, just that there are no minor casualties and little grief from loss of loved ones, i say this as the president of a great power. did senator president biden undermine ukrainian security yesterday? i think president biden made very clear and i by the way started the day with senator
who are knowledgeable about what the issue was in the first place which is potential corruption and any sort of wrongdoing by the president on a phone transcript that he voluntarily released himself, by the way. bill: they would fight that request and what would you do in turn? listen, i ll tell you what we ll do. we re ready. if the democrats are foolish enough to actually pass these frivolous articles of impeachment of which they have no evidence and factual basis, we want a trial in the senate. we re ready for a trial in the senate. the president tweeted today. if they want to impeachment do it. we see where the show is going. we re ready for it. sandra: what articles of impeachment are you referring to? what is your expectation for what will ultimately be written up? listens, nancy pelosi and others have to make that decision if they re foolish enough to advance these things. we are prepared for all scenarios. sandra: chad pergram said there was a very vague
republican member of the house of representatives had to switch to become an independent when he turned in favor of impeachment, tweeted today, expect witness tampering to be an article of impeachment. well, it s certainly impeachable. it s a high crime and misdemeanor without any doubt. but i think it could easily be folded in the broader article that chairman schiff has already indicated is likely to be recommended to the judiciary committee. and that is an article focusing on the obstruction and defiance of congress. now, as we saw with masha yovanovitch and ambassador taylor and today in the deposition of david holmes, that defiance of congress doesn t always work. but that doesn t prevent it from being a central article of impeachment. and part of that article will surely be witness intimidation of the first order. i would rather not see an
head. and so he has to diminish everyone else. and she was of course talking about the tweet he sent out attacking the ambassador during her testimony. might this become an article of impeachment? justin amash who was a former republican member of the house of representatives had to switch to become an independent when he turned in favor of impeachment, tweeted today, expect witness tampering to be an article of impeachment. well, it s certainly impeachable. it s a high crime and misdemeanor without any doubt. but i think it could easily be folded in the broader article that chairman schiff has already indicated is likely to be recommended to the judiciary committee. and that is an article focusing on the obstruction and defiance of congress. now, as we saw with masha yovanovitch and ambassador taylor and today in the deposition of david holmes, that