hearings. the other aspect, the other track that is really interesting is, look, to be realistic about it. to just follow the barometer that is going on in washington right now. judge kavanaugh is going to be confirmed. he is going to sit on the supreme court, which raises the larger question what are the democrats going to do in pursuit of rewinning the house, winning the house in 2018, and winning the presidency in 2020? where are they going? what direction is the democratic party headed in? hey, jim before we send you off on your day what are you looking at looking at the verizon of axios? bad news for trump, putting aside the tweet stuff, the house is looking worse. handicapping races, study districts putting way more republican seats in play. now you have the ingredients it would take to have a wave that
idiot. this is what i think you should do. in terms of the appointments that have been made so far, we ve gotten an announcement about national security adviser general flynn as being seen as outside the mainstream, not just in terms of national security thinking but also in terms of temperament and how willing is he to engage with people who either know to not be true or is a conspiratorial nonsense. his chief of staff who also is his son would regularly sort of tweet stuff from the infowars conspiracy theory website. he sort of traffics in that territory. right. i think we would call him a little bit of a partisan. partisan. although or registered democrat for most of his time as an adult life. very strong views. yes and now we ve got a fox news analyst who has got an interesting past of her own, brought on as the deputy national security adviser and it just feels like these aren t the kind of people who usually fill
and so you had, you know, presidents appointing people like gerald ford and george h.w. bush appointed for instance brent scowcroft who was in the government for a long time, former air force general, no one ever doubted that scowcroft would submit things to the president he served without saying this is what this guy says, he s an idiot. this is what i think you should do. in terms of the appointments that have been made so far, we ve gotten an announcement about national security adviser general flynn as being seen as outside the mainstream, not just in terms of national security thinking but also in terms of temperament and how willing is he to engage with people who either know to not be true or is a conspiratorial nonsense. his chief of staff who also is his son would regularly sort of tweet stuff from the infowars conspiracy theory website. he sort of traffics in that territory. right. i think we would call him a little bit of a partisan.
supporter of a democrat would lost to governor scott walker last night, slaps him. now, he was expecting a hug or a kiss and she slapped him. it could have been done in fun but on the heels of the tweet stuff where do you legal hi draw the line? you give maximum possible protection for the political speech. now, slapping is not speech. we watched this slap until we were blue in the face, a couple different versions and some fox is not putting on the air because people who took it did not want to us use it. it appears to me as a neutral observer as though it were aggressive love tap. the security detail was there, he smiled and the mayor smiled. neil: no, no, no, i want to pinch your cheek. by the way, it is nice to look at that rather than the people in madison that were throwing things at me. judge napolitano: if it is
either know to not be true or is a conspiratorial nonsense. his chief of staff who also is his son would regularly sort of tweet stuff from the infowars conspiracy theory website. he sort of traffics in that territory. right. i think we would call him a little bit of a partisan. partisan. although or registered democrat for most of his time as an adult life. very strong views. yes and now we ve got a fox news analyst who has got an interesting past of her own, brought on as the deputy national security adviser and it just feels like these aren t the kind of people who usually fill jobs like this. are there experiences from presidential history where the person in those kinds of jobs, where the capabilities of those job holders ended up being really crucial for national security? a perfect example would be 1962, you know, we re all talking about fidel castro tonight. you know, in the cuban missile