be impeached, and in my case, the kun thing that stands out for me, when he threatened to revoke tv licenses over questionable content content questionable to him. to me, that s an abuse of power that rises to an impeachable offense but doesn t mean we ll spend talking about it. hold on. hold on. i m trying to follow you here. you introduced articles of impeachment then tabled them. are you saying that you need actually, i you did not? no. i voted to table, yes. yeah, but you i m sorry. you also introduced them. right. co-sponsored it. a different resolution. my question. if you re co-sponsoring a resolution to introduce and also tabling them, is this trying to have your cake and eat it, too? yeah, talk about impeachment, talking about a moment ago, at the same time it s not worthwhile to try impeachment? seems they re in conflict with
after that tax rally in pennsylvania, as he s making his way to the white house, he s tweeting again, talking about what he was talking about earlier, about fake news, as he often does, but he s escalate ing that, going after the idea of network licenses, broadcast licenses, which, of course, are the purview of the public air waves. this is what he said in a tweet. let s take a look at this, anderson. he says this. network news has become so partisan, distorted and fake that licenses must be challenged and if appropriate, revoked. not fair to public. anderson, this has echoes of the nixon administration, when similar things were tried in the nixon white house, with some local licenses of tv stations owned by the washington post at the time, that was breaking all of those stories. of course, this is difficult to do. the president is largely just venting frustration. his aides said earlier. but, again, extraordinary for a president to go after network tv licenses. president of the un