we wanted to know, now is yourrp security detail going to stop ro with their high powered rifles to protect you ? office a response from his office. quote, we don t comment on matters related to th e primeto kee minister s security. so in other words, the people in power get to keepguns the gu the people lose theirs in this country, unlike canada, we have a second amendment. you d like to think that and would be protected with your second amendment from your guns and be able to have a gun politician who wantyour cl to suspend your civil liberties. well, you have a second amendment that wouldn t be ablht to do it. bil but as justice scalia famouslytw said , the bill of rights is just words on a papert protei without the government that really kills it but cares about ng ghtsprotecting your rights, you lose your rights. and that s what s happening right now. j ay ithis week, jay inslee, the governor of washington, still signed a law banningg semiautomatic rifles, which he calle
san francisco seven years later? wellar, as a practical matter,so the boycott boycott was not sa very effective. francisco did more thasan franca eight hundred million dollars in business in those states . nyatoig is that?anyway., what kind of boycott is that? even california s gavin newsom ,the governor, took a 4th ofana, july vacation in pretty boycott ana, a state the so-called boycott was ineffective. how did he end up there? no how did he still have a job?d of by the way, now, san franciscodo board of supervisors has just t voted to end this charadhee. wag a san francisco supervisor said the boycott was making the city lescient, is efficientt that s possible. specifically, the city found the boycott had cost the city fajon seventy five thousand dollars in staffing expenses. as it tus out,so as it turns ou. expensive to suppress free speech. es who knew?rd o now, this joe biden now hasserv a well established track record of nominating incompetent people to serve importan here, fo
defeat the islamic state. turns ou his ghost writer was president obama. we must support the iraqi forces which have the will to win but not the means. we will increase our support to forces fighting these terrorists on the ground. we must give these forces the consistent advantage of american air power. we will conduct a systemic campaign of air strikes against these terrorists. the united states must engage with friends and allies and lead again in this vital region. america will be joined by a broad coalition of partners. we do not need and our friends don t ask for a major commitment of american combat forces. these american forces will not have a combat mission. we will not get dragged in to another ground war in iraq. only iraq shiites, sunnis and kurds will decide if they can live together and share power and resources in a way that will serve their interests. american power can make a decisive difference, but we cannot do for iraqis, what they must do for th