officer, clearly somebody manafort understood was just that in the first place. never mind if he didn t share more than a turkey sandwich. the fact that he shared internal polling data begs the important question of why. was he just trying to kind of show that he is the man and he has got access to information that he knows that would be of interest to russians or was it something much more more that fa th whether or not he knew about it or not he was the campaign chairman at the time. that is no small thing. and internal polling matters if you re trying to influence voters a voters in sense tiitive battlegd states like wis ws or
why you drink on a plane. if you are emotionally unstable on a plane, i have for says, you will be fine. people bring on iguanas, turkeys connell: you have evidence of this? i googled it. if someone brings a turkey on the flight with me, i m going to get a turkey sandwich and eat it right next to them. i think this is terrible because if you need an emotional support animal, you probably need one on a long flight, and animals are much better than human passengers. they don t try to talk to you, they don t crunch the ice in their tomato juice. i once saw a man on a flight to l.a. clipping his toenails. a dog or cat might never do that to me. they might scratch you. emma, i think i think all these topic topics could be against gonzo men, but are you with him or the animals?
have lunch. i ate lunch. i had a turkey sandwich on a really crumbly gluten free piece of bread. no gluten. and i m glad i ate before the show. this was exhausting. it was exhausting. i think we got ourselves a little smarter by the end of the show about what happened with michael flynn, but well, our heads were spinning. at least they ve stopped. they re facing the same direction now. but katy is here, who always brings great clarity. what s the number one thing you want to know? i want to know what more does michael flynn have to offer? i mean, he s already sat with the special counsel, what was it, 19 times? 19 times. to the dethgree that mueller said virtually no sentence. my question is broader than that, beyond michael flynn specifically. what sort of message was this judge trying to send, and was he trying to send a message to those around the president who have tried to make a mockery of this whole process and undercut everything that has been going on, un
congress and congress was not going to be able to find out the truth whereas robert mueller was able to find the truth and compel him to plead guilty. at the end of the day, congress would not find out he was lying to them had it not been for robert mueller, right? lest you think or anyone think that lying to congress is only a crime if it s under oath, michael cohen has demonstrated there is a separate statute section 1001, the false statement statute, that mueller is very fond of. he s used it liberally. it criminalizes lying to congress or any executive branch body. this is not where they said did you eat a turkey sandwich or a bu burrito for lunch?
a mess. in terms of actual legal implications, we have to take a step back. even if the president is saying my business was suffered from me running for office. you re the president s business empire tied into trying to get approvals and win favors from the russian government. while he is the president who has to deal with the fact we have sanctioned russia, which is why they remain in financial crisis. i mean, the president doesn t want to investigate russian meddling. how can a president from a legal perspective possibly continue to say at this point, there s nothing? he s entitled to make the statements he wants to make but i think what we need to look at here is, you know, it s not we ve talked about this several times. it s not one thing where cohen said i had a turkey sandwich for lunch last week and it turns out he had a roast beef sandwich.