legislature passed a new law about gun permits. the new law said if you wanted a permit to carry a gun in iowa, concealed or otherwise, there were almost no grounds on which you could be turned down for that permit. under that new law which was backed by the nra, iowa sheriffs essentially lost the ability to say no to gun permits, even for reasons that historically made sense in iowa. because of that, not surprisingly, most of iowa s sheriffs opposed the nra s new law. but it passed, and the governor signed it, and a few months later, he pocketed the endorsements of the nra, whoo-hoo, for chet culver! but yeah, he lost anyway. the nra s support was not enough, and democrat chet culver lost the election that year anyway, and he got turfed out as governor. so, now iowa is governed by republican terry brenstandt, the kingdom of mustacho. still, the check culver signed has been hanging around fully in
essentially lost the ability to say no to gun permits, even for reasons that historically made sense in iowa. because of that, not surprisingly, most of iowa s sheriffs opposed the nra s new law. but it passed, and the governor signed it, and a few months later, he pocketed the endorsements of the nra, whoo-hoo, for chet culver! but yeah, he lost anyway. the nra s support was not enough, and democrat chet culver lost the election that year anyway, and he got turfed out as governor. so, now iowa is governed by republican terry brenstandt, the kingdom of mustacho. still, the check culver signed has been hanging around fully in effect for two years with some astounding results so far. the des moines register made a search of the new gun permits and discovered that now, yes, as planned, basically, everyone in iowa who asks for a gun permit gets one, and that means the list of people to whom sheriffs have had to give gun permits in
since camp david there is structured aid to the egyptian military. but there wasn t enough involvement with the political process. it s true when morsi was over author tearian and autocratic, a lot more pressure should have been put on to make sure he was being democratic. right now, what you have is a situation where basically the conservative muslim brotherhood has been turfed out. will it go underground again? will it be excluded from the political party? are we going to see again the future where it s the military and whoever else against the muslim brotherhood? what you have in its place is the second most powerful block in egypt. the ard liners. we don t appreciate their politics or their religion and they are calling the shots today. what you want is a more secler,
beginning. that s the problem. what we know now is this, is that donald trump is a hammer, and he sees everything as a nail, and from his perspective, evything becomes perna unfortunately, what he did was he bought to the provocation. he bought to what kim was trying to do. he actually ramped this up in a way he didn t need to do. he actually made this far more dangerous than is necessary, and if what he could have done was focus more on the chinese and driving the chinese to move this issue, because they are the ones who have the ability to do it, this would have gone a much different direction. this was a massive mistake and potentially a very dangerous one. to that very point, you have mcfarland, the person who was installed at the national security council by general michael flynn, who s no longer with the administration, but who is now been sort of turfed out, sent off to an ambassadorship, but she was on fox news this morning, the only senior administration official who went wi
republicans in the house are terrified of the tea party and ould n t wouldn t do anything they would be majority leader eric cantor turfed out of office by the tea party. right? you know it happened. actually happened. they took out major republican politicians. john boehner was essentially handcuffed. he had the speakership but not the party because of the tea party and i think you re seeing democrats, at least liberal democrats, start to say, wait a minute. this is what needs to happen to the democratic party. it s too corporate. it s too close to wall street itself. it s too quick to compromise with the other side and sell out core principles and i suspect that what will come out of this is going to be a really strong movement further left. under barack obama, the party moved left, became much more progressive on lgbt issues, lots of issues. it is about to i think become you ll see the left get even more strident, more insistent and probably more dominant in