committees will finally get to hear from the man behind thousands and thousands of those anti-trump text messages when he speaks to them behind closed doors about one hour from now. strzok was one of the top agents on the clinton investigation and mueller probe before he was removed by the special counsel. bill: you have senator lindsey graham he wants to know if strzok s political bias prompted the investigatn of the trump s campaigns contacts with russia in the first place. how would you like this guy supervising a confidential informant against the trump campaign given his bias and given his dislike for president trump? he should be the last guy to go to court to get a warrant on anybody associated with the trump campaign. my question is, what role did they play in the russia investigation? bill: chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge live on the hill outside the hearing room. we begin with you. good morning. thank you, bill.
see is if romney comes to washington as a senator and trump does something outrageous romney will probably criticize him but end up voting with the president maybe 90 plus percent of the time. bill: thank you, byron. sure isinteresting. talk to you again real soon. thanks. sandra: fox news alert. national security advisor john bolton is in moscow to lay the ground work for a possible u.s./russia summit. he is expected to meet foreign minister sergey lavrov and head to the kremlin with a me with president vladimir putin. kristin fisher is live from the white house. what are they expected to talk about? they are going to be talking about this possible trump/putin summit but really the time to watch is 12:30 eastern time. that s when john bolton is expected to gia press conference where he may announce the date and location of this possible trump/putin summit. john bolton is no friend to
measure to have waters censored, andy biggs. what do you hope to get out of this? i think the institution has to take a stance. that s what the framers in the constitution said. you have to police yourself. i think just making individual comments like many of us have said this is repugnant doesn t do it. she has indicated since she made her initial comments that she doesn t see anything wrong with them. that she doesn t have any remorse, no regrets, and she will continue to encourage this kind of in your face harassment of people who support president trump and work on his staff. i see visions of the elaine chao incident. for pete sake, we have a press secretary that has to have a security detail. you can t keep lighting the fuse here and hope thnoing happens because i think we are getting a tinderbox. bill: you mention elaine
all got together on the floor and said we ll dial down our rhetoric and talk about policies and issues, we ll leave personalities out of this. but we re not doing that. we aren t seeing that. what we re seeing is this kind of attempt to ratchet this up to get physical confrontations going. 24/7 in the most mundane aspects of life. eating out. bill: it s dangerous. yeah. bill: your voice is well heard, sir. thank you for coming on today and see what kind of progress you make. andy biggs with us out of arizona on the hill. sandra: speaking of civility we re learning a lot more about that restaurant owner who kicked sarah sanders out of the restaurant and set off a firestorm and a federal judge ordered the u.s. border patrol to stop separating families as president trump slams america s immigration laws. president trump: we have the worst immigration laws in the history of the world. is a joke. people can t believe it.
supreme court and how it may affect woaces nade when justices take up the case regaing unions. live for the court in moments. a lot on the line today. sandra: president trump says travel ban victory is a vindication of his tough policies. republican senator john kennedy has reaction. bill: republicans calling a vote to senator congresswoman maxine waters for her calls to target trump administration members. some say she crossed the line and they are calling for action now. the reality is, i don have anything personal against ms. waters. i just think that her discourse was actually a discredit to the house of representatives and that s the measure of whether somebody should be censored. she should be responsible for what she said.