Page 5 - Trump Magazine News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

we don t know which ones they are. we would assume that the one we reported on on friday is among them, but we do not know. other than this being tawdry, is this legally damning? so trump s folks argue it is not legally damning. that basically this was not a reimbursement. that this was about a straight-out purchase. that there was nothing wrong there that the problem is personal. the problem is not legal. i don t get that, a straight out purchase of someone s silence? look, even if you re acquiring the rights, again, donald trump was not about to put this in trump magazine, right? this was not a story he was going to publicize. it s hard to imagine what other purpose he was acquiring these for other than continuing to ensure that she would stay quiet. their argument is that there s no legal issue. i m not a lawyer. i m not a prosecutor, so i don t want to go that far, but there s a lot more that i think will be revealed as we go forward here. this is really interesting to me

Donald trumpTrump magazineRudy giuliani