challenge this case, and the first step is bringing the legal challenges before the judge. legal challenges before the we ., ., judge. doug, what do you think? could we see judge. doug, what do you think? could we see the judge. doug, what do you think? could we see the trump - judge. doug, what do you think? could we see the trump team i judge. doug, what do you think? | could we see the trump team ask for a stay of this trial? we know the former president is running to be the next president. 2024 is not far away. i president. 2024 is not far awa . ., , president. 2024 is not far awa. ., , , , , away. i would be surprised if he saw them away. i would be surprised if he saw them move - away. i would be surprised if he saw them move for- away. i would be surprised if he saw them move for a i away. i would be surprised if| he saw them move for a stay. they will try and get a trial as quickly as possible. i think there is going to be an awful lot of dispute as to a lot of the facts,
happening here it s a commentary on our times there s such fear on both sides. i m working on a book on the justice department under trump and biden. there s many good people who work in the department, but there s conspiracy theories on both sides barr commuted the sentence of roger stone and democrats called that disgraceful it s a sign of the depth of polar polarization, the fear each side thinking they re defending justice and democracy and the other side is plotting against them it s a difficult time, but this trial should go forward. donald trump should get a fair trial and people should accept the verdict. it could be an acquittal i was going to add that we re all starting to say who appointed judges, trump judge, biden judge, obama judge it makes the justice system seem
used. and it has been used to secure convictions. but there is this trump judge who said it shouldn t be used. and when that trump appointed judge ruled that way, the justice department appealed. so today was the next highest level of court. it was a federal appeals court in the d. c. circuit court of appeals which heard oral arguments on whether or not that specific felony charge can essentially be obviated for january 6th defendants. and that could have very wide consequences for everybody all the way down the line, not only people who have been convicted of the charge but people who are facing charges on facing that felony charge. and potentially a consideration of whether or not a charge like that might be used against people who are at the very top of the alleged conspiracy. again, oral arguments on that