democrats raising $23 million calling it a referendum on president trump. we will be down there. the morning of the election. tranter amazons old did to bring just base us face-to-face with a familiar credit. he thinks i would go after them for antitrust because he s controlling so much. amazon is controlling so much of what they re doing. he s using the washington post, which is peanuts, for political purposes to save amazon in terms of taxes and antitrust. abby: is this the x-acto the president is to break up? posted making money on fbi and, charles payne. what are your thoughts? this is a huge deal, obviously. it is a huge deal. it will be awkward and complicated in the fact whole
agenda stood well despite the woodshed. many new jobs, high business is the sm, 36 new legislative bill signed, infrastructure health care and tax cuts in the works. he also tweeted one minute ago about a new rasmussen, one of the most accurate in the 2016 election with an approval rating of 50% higher than obama s numbers as the president says. the president tweeting about his agenda. frustrated about the lack of coverage. but he mentioned the witchhunt. so much talk about the special counsel. is mueller conflicted, should he be fired? the attorney general and the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein, whether he should recuse himself. were you on this administration to take on the witchhunt taking on the president? let me first say this. if you look at what the
would fire him or whether he was considering it. she didn t even address whether he s considering it, just said he s not going to do it. i think one thing we ve learned in the past 24 hours is that this idea of the trump firing mueller is just a catastrophic one that rec republicans recognize as much as democrats. it is technically true that the president, through the attorney general, can fire mueller. but the idea he would do it, especially now when mueller s not done anything, it seems absurd. no one in the white house has acknowledged that he might have been considering it which is what ruddy had said. and now saying it s not going to happen. and that s what they should say. and to the extent anybody had that cross their mind, they should as quickly as they possible, scrub that memory from their head. they re not going to fire this guy. his reputation is unimpeachable. i think it s important to make
i m gonna just go back to doing what i was doing. find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. case in point on may 17th, robert muellerer was named special counsel and turns out just a day before president trump was interviewing mueller for fbi director. what a difference a day makes. the response from the white house spokesperson on whether the president would fire mueller. saying the president has the right to but he has no intention to. she didn t even address whether he s considering it, just said he s not going to do it. i think one thing we ve
justice department giving additional rational for keeping the conversations between sessions and the president confidential since president trump did not assert executive privilege? sessions, he didn t cite anything during the testimony. tonight, the department of justice, they released two memos dating back to 1982. one from then president ronald reagan and one from then assistant attorney general ted olson. a portion of the memo outlines it s possible to withhold information while the president is considering whether or not to invoke executive privilege. it s important to note that attorney general sessions did not confer with the white house at all about whether the president might even consider invoking executive privilege. that s according to a senior administration official. the memo does imply that in order to withhold testimony, the possibility of executive privilege should at least be pending for the president. thanks very much. the attorney general s status as a former lo