no, senator, that s not possible. david corn, can you tell us, in your view, who won the week? i promise i won t saying and it s hard to get good news these days. i m going with stephen airs, the trump fanatic who was arrested on january 6th. he believed the big lie and he testified this week, very moving testimony that he now sees that he was kind. he had no research, he took off the blinders, and saw that trump was lined him and everyone else and he regrets to having listened to donald trump. what s great about this is, it shows a maga extremist kim d. program himself and for himself from the trump cult. he did say he did not believe it as much. i m going to give it to you, it s good to see him make a turn. but it may not have been a full turn. it could ve been a three quarter turn. i will give you my, who won the week? my who won the week?, is in a galaxy far, far away. we are going to put it up, it s
so what s her incentive to lie? and these guys well, it didn t happen exactly the way she says. they re not testifying under oath, and they really are part of the trump cult. so i think we see serious witness tampering that the department of justice absolutely has to investigate urgently and seriously. but professor, let me interrupt for a second. how difficult is it to make a legal case for witness tampering? what is needed for proof? essentially an overt act, a statement that a reasonable person would understand as a threat or as an offer to treat one more favorably if one gives favorable testimony. it s really not that difficult. it s not rocket science. witness tampering is part of the stock and trade of criminal prosecutors in mob cases and we
anyway. she s also a loyal trump supporter. she s been with him all the time. what s her reason to lie? these guys are not testifying under oath, and they are really part of the trump cult. so i think we see serious witness tampering that the department of justice has to investigate urgently and seriously. but professor, let me interrupt for a second. how difficult is it to make a legal case for witness tampering? what is needed for proof? essentially an overt act, a statement that a reasonable person would understand as a threat or as an offer to treat one more favorably if one gives favorable testimony. it s really not that difficult. it s not rocket science. witness tampering is part of the stock and trade of criminal prosecutors in mob cases and we