before the election, you have made the payments today and it was because of the election, and because of trump s embarrassment. it doesn t matter what trump does, it was because of the election that it was an election violation. i am not a lawyer the chairman said, it does matter that if it was something other than exclusively the campaign then it is out of paid in campaign funds. my question watching that is that is that a preview then of the legal argument that they are than trying to make? yes and no. i think that the subpoena has switched gears on a number of different occasions that they attempt to go on, and indeed, they pursue this in terms of giving the indictment and moving forward i think that is one of the most straightforward things that they can respond, with primarily because, at this point, we don t necessarily know the clue and legal charges. so if he does go with that campaign file which most people expect him to do, that probably is one
they pursue this in terms of giving the indictment and moving forward i think that is one of the most straightforward things that they can respond, with primarily because, at this point, we don t necessarily know the clue and legal charges. so if he does go with that campaign file which most people expect him to do, that probably is one of the ways that he will fight it. the other, not that they may likely take is that they may claim this is embezzlement, this was pressure, because that in the public sphere as well. so it could be either or, but it does not surprise me to see them particularly pushed, this particular given that he is given about fighting the fcc chairman. so, frank, even as this is all going on, even after these death threats came to light. you had trump continuing to attack da bragg and the investigation of the social media knock off on twitter. how are social media enforcements looking to find out the hundreds of threats